Just heard on MSNBC that Mark Cuban is accused of inside trading.
No wonder MLB said there was no way he'd get hold of the Cubbies. Maybe THEY had insider information, too????
Wonder if he'll get the same treatment as Martha Stewart?
http://www.marketwatch.com/News/Story/Story.aspx?guid={4AB4CF40-63FD-4CA2-809F-C780A77D7D64}
The suite is based on hearsay. Mama.com says that they gave him insider info and he bailed on them. It's going to be hard to prove that they gave him insider info based on hearsay, unless they recorded the conversation or had it written down, I don't see this going anywhere. How do we not know that they are pissed because he sold and they are trying to conjor up some story to cost him money because he baild on them as an investor. Espn has the lawsuite on their site and it says that cuban held a 6 percent stake at the time when he sold.
This isn't hearsay. Hearsay (in its simplest form) would occur if goaliebob went to court and testified that mamma.com's CEO told him that the company gave Cuban inside info. If mamma.com's CEO goes to court and testifies that he gave insider info to Cuban it is not hearsay....its just testimony that would be weighed by the jury.
If I were a betting man, I'd guess Cuban either settles out of court or is found liable at trial and forced to pay some sort of damages. The feds *usually* don't bring cases with weak facts.
Mr. Cuban stated, “I am disappointed that the Commission chose to bring this case based upon its Enforcement staff’s win-at-any-cost ambitions. The staff’s process was result-oriented, facts be damned. The government’s claims are false and they will be proven to be so.”
The answer to this comes, oddly enough, from Randy Moss. A couple of years ago, Moss was fined $25K for something or another, and he was asked about it and said something like "Straight cash, homey, what is 25 grand to me? To me?"
The feds want to fine a man that has over a billion dollars 750K. Write them a check. Straight cash.
He should but he won't. Its only a civil case.