Why is this thread in the Directv forum? Shouldn't it be moved to the proper area?
We tried......flushed several times............... but it still comes back.
Joe
Why is this thread in the Directv forum? Shouldn't it be moved to the proper area?
I think that having internet does not necessarily mean you are not a cord cutter. The internet is pretty much now a vital part of getting things done in modern society.
According to the latest Q2 Video Discovery Trends Report from Digitalsmiths, this cord-cheating phenomenon refers to the growing trend by consumers to seek on-demand content from third-party video services and OTT services, as an alternative to their pay-TV provider’s on-demand offerings. These third-party video services include Netflix, Redbox Kiosk, Hulu and more.
Digitalsmiths feels this is an enormous threat, and one that speaks to the need for consumer-facing improvements. Based on Digitalsmiths Q2 survey of over 1,850 consumers, cord-cheating isn’t the only threat Pay-TV providers need to be worried about. The survey results also shed light on key industry topics around consumers’ TV viewing habits, their perception of pay-TV providers, and opinions of next-gen features such as personalized video discovery.
I really resent that term. It implies that if I don't bend over and spread em that I am somehow breaking a secret law.
I pay for my Netflix and Amazon subscriptions and content providers have total rights on what they make available there. I am not cheating anyone. I simply refuse to pay for a particular service and am willing to live with the limitations that implies.
Well I think it comes down to the definition of a cord cutter. I would consider you a cord cutter since you do not have cable/sat, but some define it as no paid TV at all, and Netflix is cheating.
That seems way too restrictive. As stated earlier, anyone with an internet connection, basically anyone at all these days becomes a cheater. Sooner or later everyone checks out a youtube video.
I am simply railing against the term "cheater". That word has a very strong negative connotation. I can see how the cablecos might want to label anyone not bowing down on their altar as a "cheat", but we need a way to address a positive and progressive movement toward getting alternative content and rejecting cable/satellite.
The industry has managed to break free from all regulation and rates are spiraling. They can set any rate they want, but calling me a "cheat" for refusing to pay it is unfair.
I had a bundle. TV, internet and phone for $97/month(all prices rounded to nearest dollar for ease of discussion) including tax. My bundle ran out. The Price went to $150/month including tax. I cancelled TV services. My bill now for internet and phone is $70/month. A net savings of $80/month. I called and asked for a new bundle. I was told they had no new bundles for existing customers. I have cut the cord. I use OTA and have an OTA DVR. I also use Netflix. You argue that I haven't cut the cord because I stream. That may be true. However I cut off Pay TV and am saving $80/month. That's $960/year. If they raise internet prices to $150/month I suspect a lot of people will be cutting the cord, simply because they can't afford it. I am probably going to be saving money for many years by not buying Pay TV. Coin a new term if you like. Bottom line is I cut the cord and put $960 back in my pocket!
Welcome to the site, Cuulblu!
Our bundle was the same way. Price jump way up from the 90's to about $150 at the end of the first year and then forever creeping up and up. I got rid of pay TV quite a while ago and don't regret it one bit. Quality was the main issue with us rather than money though, once I'd set up an OTA antenna and FTA dishes, the cable quality looked so bad that we didn't even want to watch it!
You could maybe even save more by dumping the phone service too. We went with the Ooma Telo probably a year and a half or so ago and it's been great for us. Phone now only costs us $3.84 a month. Initially we had to shell out $120 for the Ooma Telo, but it's already more than paid for itself in savings.