Here is the RAIDERS winning schedule for 2008!!!

Status
Not open for further replies.
i can agree with that. vick did play his best under reeves but it still wasn't good enough. people were wowed by his athleticism when he took off on his feet not by his passing game. as far as defenses he never showed enough patience to allow the play to develop.

What do you mean "not good enough"?!! Maybe not TO YOU perhaps.....but in his 5 years in the league, he made the PRO BOWL 3 times....apparently his peers thought differently. As far as patience...that has to be RE-DEVELOPED in the NFL because it is faster game in college.
 
What do you mean "not good enough"?!! Maybe not TO YOU perhaps.....but in his 5 years in the league, he made the PRO BOWL 3 times....apparently his peers thought differently. As far as patience...that has to be RE-DEVELOPED in the NFL because it is faster game in college.

too many excuses these days for young qb's. i never heard so many excuses for young qb's in my life as i hear today. that's not directed fully at you salsa it's what i hear and see today.
 
What do you mean "not good enough"?!! Maybe not TO YOU perhaps.....but in his 5 years in the league, he made the PRO BOWL 3 times....apparently his peers thought differently. As far as patience...that has to be RE-DEVELOPED in the NFL because it is faster game in college.


hay someone has to fill the spots. :D
 
Vick has never had anyone like T.O. to throw to.

i understand that salsa but before T.O. mcnabb had already produced great seasons. T.O was the icing on the cake. On Vick not having anyone like T.O. to throw to you don't need a star WR to be a successful qb. the example i posted of john elway proved that heavily. as i said ,when i can i'll post for you a second example of a great qb having success with average or less than average receivers. ;)
 
compare their 1st years as starting QBs.

i included their 1st years. you said it took time for mcnabb to develop. what time is that? by mcnabbs 2nd year he was having solid numbers before T.O.
mcnabb threw over 3,000 yds in his 2nd season and again in his 3rd season. i would call that developing pretty fast
 
Last edited:
When you are NOT picked as a starter...you picked by COACHES....so believe me, they know alot more than you and I.

I know salsita. just teasing babe :D and no one knows more about football than i do!:eek: no coach no player:D i scored 4td's in one game for high school football. i'm famous in my own mind:p
 
i understand that salsa but before T.O. mcnabb had already produced great seasons. T.O was the icing on the cake. On Vick not having anyone like T.O. to throw to you don't need a star WR to be a successful qb. the example i posted of john elway proved that heavily. as i said ,when i can i'll post for you a second example of a great qb having success with average or less than average receivers. ;)

You need a great offensive line a good receivers...and THAT Elway had ALL his career at Denver.....and what did you consider Shannon Sharpe...an offensive tackle?!:confused: He also had a very good WRs in Ed McCaffrey and Rod Smith. They may not have been HOF, but they were well knows THROUGHOUT the NFL as very good WRs. And a STUD running back in Terrell Davis.

So Elway argument is null and void....
 
You need a great offensive line a good receivers...and THAT Elway had ALL his career at Denver.....and what did you consider Shannon Sharpe...an offensive tackle?!:confused: He also had a very good WRs in Ed McCaffrey and Rod Smith. They may not have been HOF, but they were well knows THROUGHOUT the NFL as very good WRs. And a STUD running back in Terrell Davis.

So Elway argument is null and void....


SALSA, salsa....the stats i gave you were 86,87,89 before those guys came in the picture. those wr's and the rb davis were after the 1st 3 superbowl appearances john elway had with average or less than average receivers. i gave you the names of the best receivers they had on the roster for the 3 superbowl appearances in the 80's not 90's which i know you could not recognize because they were barely good. i couldn't have been clearer. rod,ed ,shannon and terrel are from what superbowl appearances? the 90's.....
you said i couldn't give you one name of a qb that had success with no name receivers and i did. 1986,87,89 john elway went to 3 superbowls with no name receivers. if you're arguing the facts which are very clear and proof that it has been done,i don't know if i should give at least one more name if you can't accept nfl recorded stats........
 
ok. let me start with john elway.
with elway: superbowl appearances in the 80's 1986,87,89

1983-87 Steve Watson WR (undrafted free agent) 6,112 yds in 9 seasons. Not a great receiver much less a Hall of Famer. He was their best wr until 1987. Two superbowl appearances with him.

1985-95 Vance Johnson WR (2nd round draft pick) 5,695 yds and 37 TD's in 11 years! Descent at best numbers. 3 superbowl appearances with him.

These were their best wr's at the time. not that good.

Finally by 1994 they got receivers like anthony miller, big man shannon sharpe and rod smith to win 2 superbowls at the end of the 90's.

John Elway is one example of making it in the NFL and making 3 superbowl appearances with average receivers early in his career 86,87,89.

I'll give you two more examples later salsa :) take care


it couldn't be clearer. notice the dates please. i made it bold so you can see it better.
 
it couldn't be clearer. notice the dates please. i made it bold so you can see it better.

THOSE receivers were VERY GOOD receivers according to NFL standards in those years. He also had Steve Watson who was a VERY GOOD receiver that averaged almost 1000 yards a season and Vance Johnson's best years WERE those 3 or 4 you mentioned and he average about 800 yards a season....NOW average season, back then, good to very good season. He did not have shlep WR or running backs. Look at THOSE numbers and comare them during those specific years you are talking about. Anyway you look at, Elway ALWAYS had good WR, TE and RB pulse one of the best offensive lines in the league. He ALWAYS had good to very good weapons at his disposal.
 
THOSE receivers were VERY GOOD receivers according to NFL standards in those years. He also had Steve Watson who was a VERY GOOD receiver that averaged almost 1000 yards a season and Vance Johnson's best years WERE those 3 or 4 you mentioned and he average about 800 yards a season....NOW average season, back then, good to very good season. He did not have shlep WR or running backs. Look at THOSE numbers and comare them during those specific years you are talking about. Anyway you look at, Elway ALWAYS had good WR, TE and RB pulse one of the best offensive lines in the league. He ALWAYS had good to very good weapons at his disposal.


See it as you like. numbers don't lie my friend ;) anyways we see eye to eye on other things so i'll just move on bud :D
 
ANYONE that knows football...knows full well that Elway almost his ENTIRE career, had weapons.

you'd be surprised on what i know about football so don't take shots at me. i got you the stats and you chose to ignore them. that's your choice. notice how no one else has argued my points on elway and what he did early in his career. your choosing to include his whole or most of his career. i showed you what he did with average receivers at the beginning of his career. you made a strong statement that no qb has ever done anything good without great receivers. i proved you wrong. deal with it. or do you need me to teach you about formations too? you do realize that the NFL isn't a video game do you?:D let me know when you want me to educate you a little on a game called football;) if you just argue for the sake of arguing than just ignore my posts for now on buddy. this going around in circles stuff is for children.In fact you sound a little like Boomer Esiason who thinks he knows more football than anyone else on this planet.
 
you'd be surprised on what i know about football so don't take shots at me. i got you the stats and you chose to ignore them. that's your choice. notice how no one else has argued my points on elway and what he did early in his career. your choosing to include his whole or most of his career. i showed you what he did with average receivers at the beginning of his career. you made a strong statement that no qb has ever done anything good without great receivers. i proved you wrong. deal with it. or do you need me to teach you about formations too? you do realize that the NFL isn't a video game do you?:D let me know when you want me to educate you a little on a game called football;) if you just argue for the sake of arguing than just ignore my posts for now on buddy. this going around in circles stuff is for children.In fact you sound a little like Boomer Esiason who thinks he knows more football than anyone else on this planet.

No....YOU started by dropping the Elway name....I mentioned the weapons he had...YOU narrowed it down to 4 years...I mentioned the weapons he had in those years YOU decided to narrow it down to. I have used YOUR links to prove my point and you have yet to counter.

The receivers I mentioned might be "average" to YOU, but I am willing to bet every receiver the Dolphins has had for the last 4 years would LOVE to have those "average" numbers. The game has changed from those years to now. But you seem to be caught in some kind of time warp that thinks the players and the numbers then are just "average".

As far as no one disagreeing with you.....have you notice anyone disagreeing with me? Huh? No one is disagreeing because more than likely no one gives a rats ass.;)
 
In fact you sound a little like Boomer Esiason who thinks he knows more football than anyone else on this planet.

On the contray.....I know no more than you do. BUT, I root with my heart and analyze with my brain.....THAT is the difference between me and most. I worked IN THE FIELD(sports media) so I think I have some insight on some things that others don't.
 
On the contray.....I know no more than you do. BUT, I root with my heart and analyze with my brain.....THAT is the difference between me and most. I worked IN THE FIELD(sports media) so I think I have some insight on some things that others don't.

you know more than i do yet your grammar contradicts that.:D

you know more than most in your own mind salsa.you don't sound like a humble man. it was nice chatting with you but i can see your gonna turn this into something personal. keep on posting :)
 
No....YOU started by dropping the Elway name....I mentioned the weapons he had...YOU narrowed it down to 4 years...I mentioned the weapons he had in those years YOU decided to narrow it down to. I have used YOUR links to prove my point and you have yet to counter.

The receivers I mentioned might be "average" to YOU, but I am willing to bet every receiver the Dolphins has had for the last 4 years would LOVE to have those "average" numbers. The game has changed from those years to now. But you seem to be caught in some kind of time warp that thinks the players and the numbers then are just "average".

As far as no one disagreeing with you.....have you notice anyone disagreeing with me? Huh? No one is disagreeing because more than likely no one gives a rats ass.;)

someone gives a rat's ass. YOU. your application of knowledge is getting childish and quite embarrassing. You go ahead and enjoy your Raiders with Russell. Bye :)
 
On the contray.....I know no more than you do. BUT, I root with my heart and analyze with my brain.....THAT is the difference between me and most. I worked IN THE FIELD(sports media) so I think I have some insight on some things that others don't.


you know the smartest member i've seen here so far with football and other sports? BillD. you know what's the greatest thing about that? he's actually humble. :) followed by sabres too. good guy,solid member. another wise and good member, paul w. examples you should follow;)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 0, Members: 0, Guests: 0)

Who Read This Thread (Total Members: 1)

Top