Bruce - I just want to point out that there is no hostile intent here. I think you're a good dude and generally agree with most of your takes. Most of this is simply an attempt at education gone askew. No one is trying to put words in your mouth.
The only problem I had with your post was when you brought up
Corporate taxes do not work like personal taxes.
I never even posted anything close to that, both of you were answering questions I never asked.
All I posted was they were receiving Tax Benefits/Write Offs for shelving content.
My main problem was with the other guy, who kept giving me different answers to the above statement, mostly to questions I never asked, from you are wrong, to the rules are loose, to there are some tax benefits, that is not how income works, there are no write offs, there are write offs, every one of his posts contradicts what the other said.
Then in his last post, after saying there are no benefits/write offs in all his responses, this-
then they get a tax benefit
Read thru his posts, all different answers, my other problem is where he is being so condescending with his answers because I am trying to understand the tax code on this particular thing.
I do not know all the answers, just like he does not know all the things I know ( and learned) with my employment, which deals with statistics and analytics, in more simple terms, trends on where this business is going.
What I was taught about business and taxes when I was going for my degree more then 30 years ago, I remember nothing about it, not one of my jobs since then has had anything to do with taxes, except when I pay others to do them.
.
My only point is that you keep posting links from news articles as your counter argument that these are magical tax credit "write-offs" and that nobody has posted anything to counter those. That's a fair point, but you have to realize nobody wants to copy and paste the tax code lol.
While these articles are factually correct on the surface,
This is why I am getting a little peeved, after reading all of (mostly) his responses , telling me I am wrong, I do not understand, other responses that were trying to put me down , you say the links I posted were correct.
you can't depend on outlets like indiewire and hollywood reporter to properly outline the correct tax structure being used here.
Should never dismiss news stories, because you do not know who/what experts they have talked to, for example, from one of my links-
"By shelving the Batgirl film, Warner Bros. will be able to reduce the loss incurred in producing Batgirl against its net income from other movies. Thus, the loss from Batgirl will reduce taxable income," James M. Bandoblu, Jr., a partner at New York-based law firm Hodgson Russ, told Newsweek.
Bandoblu, who is also head of his firm's tax dispute resolution practice.
If any of this sounds a little off, I typed it while on my LifeCycle, hard to focus while posting, peddling and watching business news all at the same time.