Planning on testing it on both the 2.4m and 3m. The 3m appears to have a tree (part of it) in the line of sight that might not be helping much with the current helical feed I have, but I did get a while back, good HRIT signal using a canantenna I built for it (when aimed to GOES16).
My dish setup(s) and tree configuration(s) in my area, petty much forces me to use the 3m for NOAAPORT and the 2.4M for GRB, but will nonetheless test on each and report.
You might be able to use the 8' dish on GRB but If all possible find a way to get a 10' for it as you'd put yourself very close to margin. Trees are easy to fix with a saw. HRIT can be acquired easily with both of those dishes as it's much stronger then the GRB signal.
One thing I want to point out that I was told so to pass it along.
The transmitters on the satellites when new put out slightly more power, then as they age the power can drop a little. That's why you want some margin on the signal so as time goes by that margin may keep you on the good side of things. Let alone inclement weather episodes that can reduce the link margin slightly. If you can get a couple of dB extra in margin the I'd go for it.
Even if you may have to put up another dish.
I use the SPF5189Z and the LNA4ALL. Although LNA4ALL gives a bit more performance, the SPF is a bit more sturdy in my opinion. On last note, I use a ZX60-P33ULN+ LNA at the feed and the aforementioned LNAs indoors for best performance.
They seem pretty similar by design. The minicircuits part you describe, I have something similar as well in my collection. Haven't messed with it much.
The Nooelec is closest to the dish feed. The other is at the receiver.
The "plan" would to be by stage:
Waveguide to probes short jumper to combiner (feed stage) short jumper, (SPF5189Z) or Ultra LNA or similar (1st stage) short jumper, bandpass filter (nooelect Sawbird+amp) or something similar (2nd Stage).
This point you have gotten every bit of gain out of the system that is possible so..
It will depend on the coax and receiver requirements, I can add the 60 dB amp (NWDZ Amp) (3rd Stage) in line to boost the incoming signal coming down the coax line or may be able to leave it out.
But I want the lowest noise in the first stage and the filter right behind that. These amps due to their boadband abilities can get overloaded by strong signals nearby not in our band. So get a filter in there to make that 2nd stage amp see only the signals of interest.
It helps that we use dishes and waveguide but with all the RF in the area it can still get in to a point.
I wouldn't be too worried about the 1st stage amp getting overloaded as the signals are very weak at this point. But after that it can become an issue.
My current test setup is just the waveguide to probes, short jumper to combiner, short jumper to 1st stage amp then 15' coax to receiver.
This LNA took about a week.
Thanks of the shipping info.
All those amps have a 1 dB noise figure or more. But for 2nd stage amps they will work fine.
If used for the 1st stage then you want to use the 1 dB NF one. Just a recommendation.