ex-Penn State coach Sandusky sentenced to 30 to 60 years in prison

Status
Not open for further replies.
But wait...there's MORE....

Oh boy...

Joe Paterno's Curious Real Estate Move

Wednesday, November 16, 2011 7:46 am

Written by: Ben Maller

Every detail, no matter how small it might seem, is under the intense spotlight in State College, Pa.

Joe Paterno's recent real estate transaction, reported by Mark Viera and Pete Thamel of the New York Times, has led some to speculate he knew his world was going to come crumbling down around him at Penn State. The winningest coach in major college football history quietly transferred complete ownership of his house to his wife for $1 less than four months before the bombshell sex abuse scandal erupted.

Some legal experts believe the move was made to financially shield the Pennsylvania pigskin legend.


The Times uncovered documents that show Paterno, who had joint possession of the home, handed control of his residence over to his wife, Sue Paterno, for a dollar plus "love and affection."

JoePa's home was originally purchased for $58,000 in 1969; the home's fair-market value in 2011 was listed at $594,484.40.

It's a development that has at least two explanations, depending on your point of view.

A lawyer for Paterno told the Times that the 84-year-old former football coach transferred the home to his 71-year-old wife as part of a "multiyear estate planning program," and the move, which was made on July 21, had absolutely nothing to do with the public embarrassment the child sex scandal involving former assistant coach Jerry Sandusky brought to the beloved football program.

Not everyone agrees.

Lawrence A. Frolik, a law professor who specializes in elder law at the University of Pittsburgh, feels that possible lawsuits from victims against Paterno might have inspired the real estate shift.

"I can't see any tax advantages," Frolik told the paper. "If someone told me that, my reaction would be, 'Are they hoping to shield assets in case if there's personal liability?'" He added, "It sounds like an attempt to avoid personal liability in having assets in his wife's name
."


Joe Paterno's Curious Real Estate Move | ThePostGame
 
Oh boy...

Joe Paterno's Curious Real Estate Move

Wednesday, November 16, 2011 7:46 am

Written by: Ben Maller

Every detail, no matter how small it might seem, is under the intense spotlight in State College, Pa.

Joe Paterno's recent real estate transaction, reported by Mark Viera and Pete Thamel of the New York Times, has led some to speculate he knew his world was going to come crumbling down around him at Penn State. The winningest coach in major college football history quietly transferred complete ownership of his house to his wife for $1 less than four months before the bombshell sex abuse scandal erupted.

Some legal experts believe the move was made to financially shield the Pennsylvania pigskin legend.


The Times uncovered documents that show Paterno, who had joint possession of the home, handed control of his residence over to his wife, Sue Paterno, for a dollar plus "love and affection."

JoePa's home was originally purchased for $58,000 in 1969; the home's fair-market value in 2011 was listed at $594,484.40.

It's a development that has at least two explanations, depending on your point of view.

A lawyer for Paterno told the Times that the 84-year-old former football coach transferred the home to his 71-year-old wife as part of a "multiyear estate planning program," and the move, which was made on July 21, had absolutely nothing to do with the public embarrassment the child sex scandal involving former assistant coach Jerry Sandusky brought to the beloved football program.

Not everyone agrees.

Lawrence A. Frolik, a law professor who specializes in elder law at the University of Pittsburgh, feels that possible lawsuits from victims against Paterno might have inspired the real estate shift.

"I can't see any tax advantages," Frolik told the paper. "If someone told me that, my reaction would be, 'Are they hoping to shield assets in case if there's personal liability?'" He added, "It sounds like an attempt to avoid personal liability in having assets in his wife's name
."


Joe Paterno's Curious Real Estate Move | ThePostGame

Forget everything else, Joe's been living in the SAME house since 1969????!!!!!!!!
 
Male sex offenders are 100% curable, "castration". If found guilty and convicted every offender should be banded like a bull, have a cone around their neck like a dog/cat after a procedure, have their hands cuffed and stay in jail just long enough for them to fall off. Then turn back them back into society. Problem solved.............they will NEVER repeat these crimes again, also knowing the consequences for would be offenders might make them think twice.
 
Forget everything else, Joe's been living in the SAME house since 1969????!!!!!!!!
Can't fault him for being frugal. No need to waste the money on a bigger house if you don't need it. I have an uncle that owns a very lucrative business, and has been living in the same nice neat little house since the early 70s. Invests his money instead.
 
Male sex offenders are 100% curable, "castration". If found guilty and convicted every offender should be banded like a bull, have a cone around their neck like a dog/cat after a procedure, have their hands cuffed and stay in jail just long enough for them to fall off. Then turn back them back into society. Problem solved.............they will NEVER repeat these crimes again, also knowing the consequences for would be offenders might make them think twice.
You're a veterinarian I take it. :D
 
Can't fault him for being frugal. No need to waste the money on a bigger house if you don't need it. I have an uncle that owns a very lucrative business, and has been living in the same nice neat little house since the early 70s. Invests his money instead.

Can't blame him either for not wanting to overspend just for the sake of it. That's not what I was getting at though. I would go mad living in the same house for over 42 years though. That's a long time to be contained to the same place.
 
Forget everything else, Joe's been living in the SAME house since 1969????!!!!!!!!
don't see anything wrong with that. back in 1969 you got a lot of house for 58k. so i'm sure its a large home valued at a little over half a mil. and you can remodel,renew and add to the home depending on the lot of course. i hope i can stay a very long time at my current home :) God permitting
 
stardust3 said:
.... also knowing the consequences for would be offenders might make them think twice.

Again, not wanting to turn this into a political issue...but we have a death penalty in plenty of states and that has not stopped people from doing stupid, crazy sh#@!
 
Again, not wanting to turn this into a political issue...but we have a death penalty in plenty of states and that has not stopped people from doing stupid, crazy sh#@!

Respectfully, what I suggest is totally different than the death penalty. A 100% curable disease. Done right in a medical setting & not the method I spoke of would enable that offender to return to society without a chance of them ever committing another sex crime & not to mention without being political the other benefits to the working people.
The interview with Bob Costas was very damning on Sandusky. If he is guilty, I hope he gets what he deserves. Unfortunately many crimes go under punished. I don't see this being any different if he is convicted.
 
If he gets convicted then don't worry. He'll get a little taste of his own medicine before he's taken care of.


Respectfully, what I suggest is totally different than the death penalty. A 100% curable disease. Done right in a medical setting & not the method I spoke of would enable that offender to return to society without a chance of them ever committing another sex crime & not to mention without being political the other benefits to the working people.
The interview with Bob Costas was very damning on Sandusky. If he is guilty, I hope he gets what he deserves. Unfortunately many crimes go under punished. I don't see this being any different if he is convicted.
 
My dad has the same house since 72

Mine since the 50s at least (pretty sure that is when the original part was built). Of course if you saw it then, and see it now you wouldnt know it. Remodeled, built around, part torn down, added to, ect.
Its not uncommon.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

NFL Week 5 Picks (Thursday Game)

Detroit Lions legend Alex Karras has passed away

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 0, Members: 0, Guests: 0)

Who Read This Thread (Total Members: 1)

Top