it is MTV people are complaining aboutIt's not MTV that people were complaining about, but the 22 other garbage channels that Viacom forces Dish to bundle with it.
Even the once-popular Comedy Central has really gone downhill in ratings.
it is MTV people are complaining aboutIt's not MTV that people were complaining about, but the 22 other garbage channels that Viacom forces Dish to bundle with it.
Even the once-popular Comedy Central has really gone downhill in ratings.
If boxing is so 15 years ago you'd better crawl back into your mama's womb because there are a ton of boxing fans out there.Boxing is ,sooooo 15 years ago...
Samsung Galaxy S6 Active
Boxing is nothing like it once was.If boxing is so 15 years ago you'd better crawl back into your mama's womb because there are a ton of boxing fans out there.
Boxing was good when it was on ABC
Boxing is nothing like it once was.
Period.
I think you better Crawl out from under your rock.
Samsung Galaxy S6 Active
In fact we have boxing on ESPN tonight. Last week CBS carried it....It may not be, but unlike the MMA stuff, it is not only on premium channels, but quite a few cable channels and even broadcast in both prime time and non primetime slots.
So maybe it isn't us boxing fans under rocks but you might very well be.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
And the last Main event, had less viewers then there is NFL ST subscribers.It may not be, but unlike the MMA stuff, it is not only on premium channels, but quite a few cable channels and even broadcast in both prime time and non primetime slots.
So maybe it isn't us boxing fans under rocks but you might very well be.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Not that it really matters, I am just curious, what is your train of thought in your preference for them not to acquire Starz? I really do not see any negatives, seems one of the better outcomes for a spun off network that has been having to stand independent for the past few years. They will have a feeder for films and series that has previously not been available. Lionsgate is not a "huge multimedia conglomerate" on par with Viacom, Time Warner, Disney, etc... Since Malone's goal with spinning Starz off of one of the Liberty companies was ultimately an acquisition, I really can't see how it could have turned out any better for a "independent" suitor.
In a way, I agree with Deadlocked.
But what makes HBO so popular is their Movie Library and their Series Library.
Starz might be getting better, But HBO has Older series that people will watch over and over again and they have so many people, that will always pick HBO.
And they Still make new series.
I've subscribed to HBO since 2002.
Starz just does have the History that HBO does.
But Boxing , I wouldn't use that as an example.
And I also wouldn't use the month of June for ratings.
Also it's a well know fact that Saturday nights are the worst nights for all tv ratiings.
Samsung Galaxy S6 Active
No. The argument is just not worth finding data for and making. Just choosing to step aside. If that means you win, you win. It's cool.
Look at these numbers.
This is why Starz will never be HBO.
http://www.cinemablend.com/televisi...ranos-HBO-Most-Popular-Series-Ever-64500.html
Sopranos 18.2 million viewers per episode.
Game of Thrones 18.4 million viewers per episode.
That's just the top 2.
http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2016/06/27/cable-live-7-ratings-june-6-12-2016/
What I find even more hilarious is the people that wanted Dish to Dispute Viacom .
Cleary people watch MTV even if it's only an hour a week.
But here,
Outlander is Starz most popular series ever.
And at a viewership of only 1.04 million.
Hardly a threat to HBOs popularly
http://tvseriesfinale.com/tv-show/outlander-season-two-ratings/Outlander might be the most popular thing going on right now.
So that's where I kind of agree with Deadlocked.
But July HBO has a new series Vice Principals. And I think even a few others.
So IMO, Starz isn't a threat to HBOs popularity.
Samsung Galaxy S6 Active
It may not be, but unlike the MMA stuff, it is not only on premium channels, but quite a few cable channels and even broadcast in both prime time and non primetime slots.
So maybe it isn't us boxing fans under rocks but you might very well be.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
If you say so.So you're offering up a show that ended years ago during HBO's golden era and is not shown presently in reruns and a show we already agreed was at the top and not in this discussion as could term evidence to my numbers? C'mon man. My post was apples to apples (most recent dramas on both networks not named GOT) and Starz clearly won and will likely continue to beat out everything from HBO minus GOT now that TD seems to be getting softly cancelled.
With that said I hope Westworld does amazingly.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Fox, FX, FS1, and FS2 are premium channels? Also AXS and Spike has MMA too.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
HBO on demand, HBO go, and HBO Now.The issue is HBO rarely shows older shows now. If they would binge/marathon the older shows I can agree on that front but otherwise that's on demand/streaming/Amazon prime and doesn't have to be on HBO.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
I said congrats. You did the research I choose not to. You win, congrats man. Not worth looking into, as it affects nothing in the near future price-wise.So I get asked for data but once I get it to prove you guys wrong it's not worth finding data? C'mon man...
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
HBO on demand, HBO go, and HBO Now.
That is an endless library of old and new.
Why must you insist that it be a live only channel?
If you subscribe to HBO you have access to all of its content.
My point that you failed to figure out, was HBO has a reputation that keeps loyal customers coming back to stream over and over their favorite series that smashed anything that Starz has ever put out.
Samsung Galaxy S6 Active