There is rural and then there is RURAL. You live in a rural area. People in Montana live in a RURAL state.
I think Paramount is starting to care. Lol.I don't think the content providers care until profits start dropping
and Warner and Fox and Disney.I think Paramount is starting to care. Lol.
But in those area, is a very sparse population, not enough people to support a Satellite TV Service.There is rural and then there is RURAL. You live in a rural area. People in Montana live in a RURAL state.
and Warner and Fox and Disney.
They all had reduced income/profits with their Broadcast and/or Cable Channels.
well.....there are still many areas that don't have access to reliable,internet.Sure there is starlink but not many folks in those areas can afford it.So there is still a place for satellite tv.Maybe Amazon's satellite internet will make it more affordable but that's a long way off.
Gov't is currently funding broadband build-out in more rural areas, but really people themselves are driving rural inclusion- they expect broadband connectivity and that expectation is driving build-out as well. If they can work from home, they're choosing the hinterlands to work from, and they expect that utility. The numbers of people truly stranded from broadband is rapidly diminishing to a relative handful.Redbox stuck around in rural areas for a few years after the video store collapse, but eventually it folded too.
My current neighborhood, they did not have broadband till 2018, 2 years before I bought this house, Charter would never have done the build out here, but thanks to money from the State and Federal Government, they did it.Gov't is currently funding broadband build-out in more rural areas, but really people themselves are driving rural inclusion- they expect broadband connectivity and that expectation is driving build-out as well.
Yes, I have been saying they could do the best service with Sling TV prices and DISH guides, menus, dvr features, but streaming versions. I think that would be very successful. Because you can already use Air TV to add your ota locals integrated in with the Sling TV guide, so why not make it work with the DISH IP service as well.Sure more and more places are getting broadband. But for many folks who try the Internet services they are finding them hard to use and not reliable.
In my own home we stopped using DISH for a month and tried all of the services we could. And the wife and kids didn't like any of them and wanted their Hopper 3 back. I think the Hopper 3 may be helping keep Dish subscribers sticky.
I would be surprised if we see a slight increase in subscribers for DISH this fall. Finally after a strange year because of the strike, real TV and shows will be back, and people will again want the ease of viewing and the features that DISH gives with the Hopper 3.
Again I will say I would not be surprised at all if DISH does file bankruptcy. Bankruptcy is not a bad thing. (Hell I just went through it) It may be just what they need to keep the company alive and perhaps even help it thrive.
Will DISH be here in 10 years? Will DIRECTV? Thats hard to say, but I am sure we will have both of them for years to come, and I do hope both continue to embrace and change as the technology changes. DISH should have an IP service that mirrors its satellite service, SlingTV is NOT it. And have software that mimics about the things people love about the Hopper 3. I could see that being very successful.
There may be some dark clouds in the sky, but ultimately the sky is not falling.
Satellite service is the cheapest service to supply to RURAL areas. Population density is irrelevant to satellite services, with the small exception of installation cost by a tech. The infrastructure is already there all you do is add a dish and a receiver - BOOM!But in those area, is a very sparse population, not enough people to support a Satellite TV Service.
Content providers income comes from how many subscribers the cable and satellite providers have. As Dish loses subs, the amount they pay to the providers also goes down, to a point losing subs might actually help the bottom line especially if programming is too expensive.I don't think the content providers care until profits start dropping
My red box machine is still in front of my Walgreens. Never stopped and looked if it was plugged in? lolRedbox stuck around in rural areas for a few years after the video store collapse, but eventually it folded too.
What does that have to do with having enough subscribers for a service to be profitable?Satellite service is the cheapest service to supply to RURAL areas. Population density is irrelevant to satellite services, with the small exception of installation cost by a tech. The infrastructure is already there all you do is add a dish and a receiver - BOOM!
Still have plenty of subsContent providers income comes from how many subscribers the cable and satellite providers have. As Dish loses subs, the amount they pay to the providers also goes down, to a point losing subs might actually help the bottom line especially if programming is too expensive.
Amazon will probably never be a viable competitor to Starlink. Project Kuiper has only launched 2 prototype satellites and those have already been decommissioned. The only way they're going to be able to start doing regular launches is with SpaceX rockets and Bezos isn't about to ask Elon for help.well.....there are still many areas that don't have access to reliable,internet.Sure there is starlink but not many folks in those areas can afford it.So there is still a place for satellite tv.Maybe Amazon's satellite internet will make it more affordable but that's a long way off.