Light Squared is sounding pretty desperate... They complain that Dish is trying to take control of the company, then they complain that Dish is playing dirty by not trying to take control of the company...
Don't confused the company with its creditors. Those are two very different interest groups (hence the differing stances related to Dish's bid).Light Squared is sounding pretty desperate... They complain that Dish is trying to take control of the company, then they complain that Dish is playing dirty by not trying to take control of the company...
I wish some of this crap would finally backfire on Dish and cost them lots of money. Its nothing more than a game to Charlie Ergen
and I wish your store would burn down and cost you lots of money! Enough already Claude!
Ergen Called to Defend $1 Billion LightSquared Debt Deal http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2014-...-defend-1-billion-lightsquared-debt-deal.html
I bet somehow Ergen manages to come out ahead on the deal.
If it wasn't such a shady maneuver, then why did he have to do it under a shadow company?
Any way you look at it, it screams conflict of interest at best, laundering at worst, when the CEO of a company is using that company's money to pay off debt that was bought at a discount with that same person's own personal money.
So, he was just participating in the bidding to drive the price up without actually having any real chance of winning the bid, so he could get more money for his debt from another entity. Yeah, that makes it so much better.
Good job...when unable to bring anything to the argument table, resort to an ad hominem.If you had a few billion lying around and knew if you bought up some debt that you could make a great return on you money, would you honestly say you would not do it? Or is it because you are not a billionaire that you are bitter that the opportunity did not present itself to you?
Good job...when unable to bring anything to the argument table, resort to an ad hominem.
On a much smaller scale, what Charlie did is no different than an Ebay seller bidding up his own item with a different account to generate a higher sale price for his auction. I suppose you think that's ok. too.
Well... if you were a billionaire, you'd do that too.Good job...when unable to bring anything to the argument table, resort to an ad hominem.
On a much smaller scale, what Charlie did is no different than an Ebay seller bidding up his own item with a different account to generate a higher sale price for his auction. I suppose you think that's ok. too.