At any rate, have you read this entire thread?
hate to admit it, but yes. been following it and the other since day one. Just a few more days!
At any rate, have you read this entire thread?
So, you don't think the consumer has a right to know what is going on?
I apologize if I am speculating but... I thought the whole purpose of the SatelliteGuys forums was to open up specific topics for debate and discussion.
With obvious intent -- but they are your shoes.
.
demsd said:Huh? The whole point I was making.
They can take my Internet when they pry it from my stiff, carpal-tunnel-numbed fingers.I'm thankful I get by with the welcome pack & TV doesn't mean that much to me, take my internet away & that would be a different story...............
When a channel is going to be dropped, yes I think it's incumbent on the principles to tell the consumer why.
Some of the best ideas come from speculating.
If your looking for confrontation you won't find it here, there are others who are more than willing to debate this nonsense.
No it's not. Every household in America responds to the U.S. Census. Statistics are drawn up and averages are made including the average occupants of a household. They even create household averages for specific age groups. Your point was that in any given area a group of yahoos can get together and watch something. I'm talking about using official data and statistics to derive a number of average possible household viewers. What do you think they say "one house, one viewer?" No! But you are right, they don't take the large groups into effect. Both the networks and the advertisers use this data.
Here is the problem I have with this.... Why be a subscriber of the provider that constantly decides to "stand up to these companies and say no" as you put it? Why be part of the service that takes channels from you "for the greater good" more than any other provider?
The thing is, I do believe Dish's disputes probably do help keep television service prices down somewhat, but not just for Dish customers. For instance, Dish says no to an increase and pulls a channel. They piss off customers who watch the channel and do all the work to fight with the channel. Say they then get it back, which isn't always the case. Now they have gotten it down to a price they wanted. Now there is a value set for the channel going forward. The other providers might not know the exact settled upon amount but they pay people to make their best possible guess. They also know it probably wasn't a huge increase if Dish got it back. Now when it's Directv's turn they can just come in and say we want the price Dish got. They aren't going to pay more than Dish when they know that is a number the channel in dispute has already agreed to. In the end Directv gets the same negotiation for a similar price without the dispute and pissed off customers.
Sure it's nice that one of the providers is willing to pull channels to prove their point. I'm just not sure why people would be so happy to be a part of all the fights when the other providers all offer similar products for similar prices.
if an agreement is not reached before july 1st and amc networks are taken down, I don't see amc networks coming back for awhile or at all.
i like the walking dead too. maybe dish and amc networks will reach an agreement.there will be heck to pay if I have to miss any new Walking Dead episiodes this fall
Are you into that horror stuff?i like the walking dead too. maybe dish and amc networks will reach an agreement.
Are you into that horror stuff?
you know i am
there will be heck to pay if I have to miss any new Walking Dead episiodes this fall
MikeD-C05 said:IN the over 15 years of DISH service I have not had any real channels removed that I cared about and that didn't return eventually. I liked the Hd versions of the ABC family and DISNEY removed and I was Okay with that, because I think that Disney was Crazy to try to get Paid twice for both sd and Hd feeds of the same channels. Since they removed the hd version I rarely watch anything on any of these channels now. Lost the Voom channels , and I really liked Monsters Hd, but towards the end when they actually took them off the air, I had lost interest ,because Voom showed the same 4 shows over and over again on their channels all day long. I agreed with DISH's decision to yank the 20 channels and condense them down to 5. When Voom /Cablevison squaked and wanted all 20 on the air or nothing , I agreed with DISH's decision to remove them all. Sports channels I could care less about , and wouldn't mind all of them removed and spun off in their own Premium pack. The whole auto hop lawsuit is about standing up to network tv and their affiliates who want to extort more amd more money for carrying channels that are free over the air. Charlie is standing up for the entire pay tv business by saying NO to these greedy bastards. I agree with him and his position on THESE issues. As I said before I do NOT agree on the FEE structure or the new State Surcharge bull crap. As for DIRECTV , you might get the channels ,but you will pay more to watch them. They are already $10.00 more per programming pack then DISH.
Season 3 will be 16 episodes. I'm planning on buying the first half of Breaking Bad Season 5 (8 episodes) in sd ($1.89 each) if I have to from Amazon. I've already read The Walking Dead graphic novels, so I can wait for Season 3 to show up on Netflix sometime next year.Amazon VOD $2.84/episode in HD... No commercials no popups... If they do their 6-10 episodes 18-30$
demsd said:Advertisers use census data to determine how many people might watch a particular show? If DISH has 14 million subs, that could translate into 42 million potential viewers [using an average of 3 people to a household], or 84 million eyeballs. Advertisers don't care what a shows potential viewership could be.
Advertisers will either buy a specific show that has a target audience they want (Depends during Murder She Wrote/Ax during Friends) or buy 'Run of Schedule' (cheaper) and the network decides where the commercial will go. Potential viewership has very little if anything to do with it. Think about it... if everything was strictly subscriber based, the commercial cost would be the same at 2am as it is at 8pm. The 'potential' viewers are the same both times.They don't? That's why I see ads for Depends during friends and ads for ax body spray during murder she wrote. Advertisers do care about potential viewership. They want the most amount of people to see their ads, or pay less for lower viewing times. Potential viewership has everything to do with it. I'm not going to buy ad time for my denture cream during a show like the big bang theory or UFC on FOX.
No, actually what you were talking about (whether you meant it or not) was advertisers picking their shows/networks based on target audiences (demos). That's why you might see a Depends commercial during 'Murder She Wrote' (your example). And, it doesn't matter how many subscribers a network has, if no one's watching, no one will see the ad.I'm referring to advertisers buying time known that an entire subscriber base is missing. They will ask for a discount if their ad is going to not reach a large group of viewers.