True....but..... maybe as a result that's why generally Dish costs less. And the the worm is slowly turning. Not just Direct TV but some Cable companies also are more prone to let a channel remove itself instead of just paying now.
Didn't Directv just have an extended battle with Viacom?I understand what you are saying.........but why is it Dish is always the one fighting the battle...........does Direct tv not have the same programming? yet they seldom have long lasting disputes............only with Dish
They had a dispute. But, it wasn't lengthy. And, DirecTV wanted to keep the channels on the air during negotiations. (But, Viacom pulled them and removed all Internet access to their programming to prevent DirecTV customers from viewing.)Didn't Directv just have an extended battle with Viacom?
The blackout lasted for nine days. I would consider that lengthy but certainly not as lengthy as the marathon AMC/Dish dispute. http://mediadecoder.blogs.nytimes.c...m-settle-dispute-over-fees-restoring-service/They had a dispute. But, it wasn't lengthy. And, DirecTV wanted to keep the channels on the air during negotiations. (But, Viacom pulled them and removed all Internet access to their programming to prevent DirecTV customers from viewing.)
True. I guess it was moderately lengthy, indeed. Not being directly affected, myself, it didn't seem that long to me, at the time.The blackout lasted for nine days. I would consider that lengthy but certainly not as lengthy as the marathon AMC/Dish dispute. http://mediadecoder.blogs.nytimes.c...m-settle-dispute-over-fees-restoring-service/
You can't seem to spell Dispute without D-I-S(h). Dish vs. Disney, Dish vs. YES Network, Dish vs. MSG, Dish vs. Comcast/Philly, Dish vs. MLB still ongoing. And not to forget oldies but goodies like Dish vs. Voom, Dish vs. AMC, Dish vs. Fox, Dish vs. multitudes of local channels, Dish vs. Tivo, Dish vs. FCC, etc. And of course Dish Hopper vs. Big 4 Nets just getting started.
DISH is the one that is willing to fight. DIRECTV for their part typically caves in. That's a good part of the reason why DIRECTV costs the average customer over $18 more per month than DISH.I understand what you are saying.........but why is it Dish is always the one fighting the battle...........does Direct tv not have the same programming? yet they seldom have long lasting disputes............only with Dish
MLB was never a dispute. DISH has carried MLB network since September 2011.MLB still ongoing.
DISH is the one that is willing to fight. DIRECTV for their part typically caves in. That's a good part of the reason why DIRECTV costs the average customer over $18 more per month than DISH.
DIRECTV seems more about maintaining the status quo at any cost and that's not good for anyone given that the status quo is skyrocketing prices.
Cost can be nearly the same depending on the slant of the comparison.
I generally have it all.
With D* I have Premier, HD Extra, 3 receivers with D* comes to $155 approximately.
Doing the same with Dish, AEP, BB@Home, 2 Hoppers, Multi-Sport comes to $156 approximately.
The difference is a wash.
At other levels, it can vary from that wash of mine to about $15 from the numbers I've juggled around. Never could get to anything more than that except during 1st year promos.
In disputes, the biggest difference I've noticed over the years is that E* is willing to pull the trigger quicker that D* for the most part. But I think when all the dust settles, that both D* and E* customers benefit from that because it sets the rates that are negotiated. IOW, I doubt that D* would pay more than what E* was able to negotiate for.
I think the average direct tv customers pay around $100 while the average Dish user us around $80. I remember reading that somewhere recently.
On the high end Dish and DIRECTV tend to run neck and neck for the same price.
On the low end, however Dish gets a lot of customers with AT120. Yes fewer channels than DIRECTV, but many want to give up channels for a lower price.