The following line was included in the story in my local newspaper (Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, assembled from New York Times and Associated Press stories) this morning on the final omnibus appropriations bill, drafted just before midnight Friday:
"Satellite TV companies will be allowed to beam high definition network signals to some remote customers..."
(The paper's site is www.ardemgaz.com, but most of their stories are for subscribers only. May be easier to find the underlying stories at www.nytimes.com, wire.ap.org, or other sites.)
So it seems we WILL see some form of HD distant locals. What the specifics are, as well as what it says on other issues (such as the two-dish solution and significantly-viewed channels), is still unknown; Thomas (thomas.loc.gov) doesn't have the final bill or conference report yet. (The bill being amended into the final bill is H.R. 4818, previously the "foreign operations" appropriations bill; the conference report is H.Rept. 108-792.) I'd be surprised if the House compromise on royalties wasn't in the final bill, since it was agreed to by representatives of both the satellite companies and major copyright owners (including MPAA).
There is a threat of a Senate filibuster (some women senators are opposed to a provision saying hospitals and doctors that get Federal funds no longer have to tell a woman who asks about abortion where to get one), but with a partial government shutdown looming if the bill doesn't pass today, it's almost certain to pass.
"Satellite TV companies will be allowed to beam high definition network signals to some remote customers..."
(The paper's site is www.ardemgaz.com, but most of their stories are for subscribers only. May be easier to find the underlying stories at www.nytimes.com, wire.ap.org, or other sites.)
So it seems we WILL see some form of HD distant locals. What the specifics are, as well as what it says on other issues (such as the two-dish solution and significantly-viewed channels), is still unknown; Thomas (thomas.loc.gov) doesn't have the final bill or conference report yet. (The bill being amended into the final bill is H.R. 4818, previously the "foreign operations" appropriations bill; the conference report is H.Rept. 108-792.) I'd be surprised if the House compromise on royalties wasn't in the final bill, since it was agreed to by representatives of both the satellite companies and major copyright owners (including MPAA).
There is a threat of a Senate filibuster (some women senators are opposed to a provision saying hospitals and doctors that get Federal funds no longer have to tell a woman who asks about abortion where to get one), but with a partial government shutdown looming if the bill doesn't pass today, it's almost certain to pass.