How are they going to catch up with sat/cable? It isn’t like sat/cable has put a price freeze on their services.$treaming i$ going up in price too. Catching up, I daresay. Without providing as good of a DVR experience.
How are they going to catch up with sat/cable? It isn’t like sat/cable has put a price freeze on their services.$treaming i$ going up in price too. Catching up, I daresay. Without providing as good of a DVR experience.
It is not even close, when I get Paramount, Peacock, Hulu, Disney, Showtime, HBO(MAX) and Netflix, all in the no commercials/4K tier, pay about $80 a month, I basically get 20 times the content that is on Traditional Paid Live TV.$treaming i$ going up in price too. Catching up, I daresay.
With the on demand streaming services, I have no need of a DVR, plus the fact I do not have commercials, no need to REW/FF, I can, just no need.Without providing as good of a DVR experience.
Your assertion/assumption that the prices for streaming won't make a similar jump in the future is questionable.It is not even close...
And Paid Live TV will do the same.Your assertion/assumption that the prices for streaming won't make a similar jump in the future is questionable.
That is only for the upgrade to 4K, plus, I believe , the sports content, not sure on that part.Consider how quickly Max got to $21.
While your assertion/assumption that the prices for cable/satellite won't make a similar jump in the future is questionable.Your assertion/assumption that the prices for streaming won't make a similar jump in the future is questionable.
You seem to feel compelled to say this a lot.I never wrote...
The original Max included 4K content.That is only for the upgrade to 4K, plus, I believe , the sports content, not sure on that part.
My assertion is based on a long-established history. Streaming price increases have been mostly unpredictable but when they do happen, they tend to be more than 10%.While your assertion/assumption that the prices for cable/satellite won't make a similar jump in the future is questionable.
There you go again using useless percentages that mean nothing. Talk dollars and cents for the cost of satellite/cable vs streaming.My assertion is based on a long-established history. Streaming price increases have been mostly unpredictable but when they do happen, they tend to be more than 10%.
Why are you focused on MAX’s pricing, it is the total that counts, add them all together, still extremely less expensive then Cable/Satellite TV.You seem to feel compelled to say this a lot.
The original Max included 4K content.
I just checked my new Xfinity rate card and it shows that the Broadcast Channel fee will rise to a mind-blowing $37.75 on January 5th. Their idea of lifeline service is $55/month.
The bottom line is not a particularly good metric as it is composed of multiple component costs that change more or less at random.Talk dollars and cents for the cost of satellite/cable vs streaming.
I've never held Comcast up as a pillar of reasonable pricing. On the contrary, they are perhaps one of the best examples of how bad iit can get.And you actually tried to argue streaming prices are getting close to Cable/Satellite TV……ha.
The bottom line is the only metric to use.The bottom line is not a particularly good metric as it is composed of multiple component costs that change more or less at random.
Also, the subscriptions come and go as well based on running out of desirable content or the expiration of promotions so it is necessary to conjure up some form of multiplier (a percentage) that describes what to expect overall. This is where the time spent maintaining the overall TV toolbox enters into play.
On the other hand, if cost isn't the primary concern, it is rather academic to discuss how it changes,
How do we compare and contrast our bottom lines?The bottom line is the only metric to use.