Antenna suggestion

[No Static At All]

If you scroll towards the bottom of this page, there is a chart that shows"db gain over reference dipole" for various channels. Average gain for VHF-HI is 9.325db versus 8.2db for the HBU44. UHF average gain is 11.75db versus a dissapointing 8.2db for the HBU44 considering it's size.

 

[TomCat4680]

If you scroll towards the bottom of this page, there is a chart that shows"db gain over reference dipole" for various channels. Average gain for VHF-HI is 9.325db versus 8.2db for the HBU44. UHF average gain is 11.75db versus a dissapointing 8.2db for the HBU44 considering it's size.

Why does it say the range is 40 miles VHF and and 30 miles UHF then? Typo maybe?

 

[dishman007]

i use the winegard amplified sensor alot in your area
with good results

 

[boba]

Tomcat there is no standard for determining milage for reception of TV signals. Companies like Radio Shack are notorius for being generous in their milage estimates while old timers like Channel Master and Winegard have been more conservative in their promises. Their products will usually deliver what is promised and more milage. The other quality that you need to look at is quality of construction. Is an antenna that will last 2 yr. and cost you $25 a better buy than an antenna that will last 5 years but cost you $50. The quality of connectors and construction can affect your reception.

 

[No Static At All]

Why does it say the range is 40 miles VHF and and 30 miles UHF then? Typo maybe?

I'm not sure why Winegard is so conservative with thier mileage estimates. Like I said, it just creates confusion when you see other brands with bloated numbers, so it's best not to rely on them for real world conditions. The gain numbers are a much better indicator of what to expect.

It's kind of like deciding on a TV purchase based soley on advertised contrast ratios between different manufacturers. I base my decision on what my eyes see, and pay little or no attention to that particular specification.