Bill, I'm watching "Who's #1?" on ESPN Classic ranking the 20 best MLB teams ever.
The 2004 Red Sox were ranked #13 on that list- I was wondering how you feel about that team that broke the Curse of the Bambino ranked as high as they are?
Here's a list of the 20 teams:
Who's Number 1?: MLB Teams
(I'm cool with it; just wanted to get your perspective)
Also, which Red Sox team was better- 2004 or 2007?
I actually think that the '07 team was SLIGHTLY better.
The '07 team was better at 1B (Youk over Millar), 2B (Pedroia over Bellhorn), 3B (Lowell over Mueller by the slimmest of margins) and RF (Drew over Nixon).
The '04 team was better at SS (BOTH Nomar and O-Cab over Lugo), CF (Damon over Crisp) and C (Varitek was a better player in '04).
Both DH and LF were a wash with Papi and Manny.
The rotations were VERY close, but I like the '07 rotation better.
Schilling was clearly better in '04, but I'll take the '07 Beckett, Dice-K, Lester and Wakefield over the '04 Pedro, Lowe, Arroyo and Wakefield.
Not to take anything away from Keith Foulke, who had a memorable postseason run in '04, but he's not the lights out closer that Papelbon was (is) in '07.
The supporting bullpen casts were close (I'd certainly take the '04 Mike Timlin over the '07 version), but I think the '07 pen of Timlin, Hideki Okajima, Manny Delcarmen, Brendan Donnelly, J.C. Romero, Kyle Snyder, Javier Lopez, Eric Gagne (UGHHH!!!) and Joel Pineiro was SLIGHTLY better than Timlin, Alan Embree, Mike Myers, Curtis Leskanic, Ramiro Mendoza, Scott Williamson and Lenny DiNardo.
Where 2004 gets a SIGNIFICANT advantage over '07, IMO, is the bench. The '04 bench of Doug Mientkienicz, Dave Roberts, Gabe Kapler, Pokey Reese, Kevin Youkilis and Doug Mirabelli was deeper than '07's Eric Hinske, Jacoby Ellsbury, Bobby Kielty, Wily Mo Pena, Alex Cora and Mirabelli.
Sorry for the long winded answer, but I wanted to provide my arguement that the '07 team was SLIGHTLY better (but the '04 team will ALWAYS have a special place in my heart).