OSU had a relatively benign schedule... by benign schedule standards. Yes, generally the schedules across the nation were easier than normally easy schedules they have. But OSU hasn't played anyone of significance... or even consequence.
Technically those games were against jobbers too. OSU's schedule lacked any competition whatsoever, especially with a down and out Michigan.
The issue is the schedules that were made up were very limited, nothing the Buckeyes could do about that ...
It's not thier fault that Penn State, Michigan State and TTUN were WAY below standards this year.
Fwiw, Bama did not play anyone good when they played them ...
Clemson didn't play anyone other than Norte Dame, which in normal years they would not have played.
So, the schedules are what they are this year ...
One problem I see with the Buckeyes and I hope it doesn't hurt them in the long run ...
Teams typically get stronger as the year goes on, reason for playing those easy games early, so you can see what you need to work on and get stronger.
The Buckeyes have been so inconsistent playing games that they haven't have that consistency to have the different areas Gell.
They played the first 3 games, then they have not played 2 weeks in a row since.
The offense is doing fine (Running the ball hasn't been as good as expected) but the rest has been fine.
However, the Defense needs time to gell, the D Line has come around nicely, but the new kids playing in the secondary have not had enough games together to really gell .... heres hoping that will improve starting this week, once again, a game after a canceled week and they would have another week off before the Jan 1st Semi's if they get that far.
On as positive, we don't get teams having 3 weeks off before playing in thier next game, like normally in bowl/ playoff season.