2016 NCAA football discussion thread
- Thread starter Ronnie-
- Start date
- Latest activity Latest activity:
- Replies 1K
- Views 84K
So we won the rose bowl for the natty, it's even in our fight song. We have in fact played in it more than any non conference tie in team, and have a higher winning percentage in it than OSU.
Then there is the cotton bowl, which we've played in several times.
In both cases, your statement is ill informed.
In any case, conferences have bowl tie ins, what do you suggest they do? Schedule their own bowl games ?
As to the regular season, who does go out of their region during the yeah that often? Conferences are more or less regional. That's the bulk of every team's schedule.
Bama plays ooc as well as anyone. We have done a h&h with a big ten school in the past few years.
I haven't had a chance to drive in the southeast to a OSU game lately. Is that a fault I should call them on?
Sent from my Pixel using Tapatalk
Game ain't over yet - VT proved they could come back from 24 down and completely dominate a 2nd half.
VT came back from 20 down against Clemson to almost take the game so I'm not saying that will happen with OSU but Clemson must not let up.
VT put up 35 against this same Clemson team and took them to the wire.
VT came back from 20 down against Clemson to almost take the game so I'm not saying that will happen with OSU but Clemson must not let up.
VT put up 35 against this same Clemson team and took them to the wire.
Maybe the Suck 10 should have sent their actual Champ to the playoff? #toosoon
Clemson Bama will be good. Bama would curb stomp the Pizza Boys.
Clemson Bama will be good. Bama would curb stomp the Pizza Boys.
Well that's game.. Clemson dominating!
They aren't coming back from 24 down - only VT can do that
Also did I mention VT had Clemson on their heels and put 35 up on em to the end?
They aren't coming back from 24 down - only VT can do that
Also did I mention VT had Clemson on their heels and put 35 up on em to the end?
Scrubs man. Couldnt win conference, needed overtime to beat a weak Michigan team. This was obvious.
It will be outstanding Clemson D vs outstanding Bama D. Great Clemson offense vs lethargic Alabama offense (if they play like they did today). Gonna be another great natty game, just sucks having to watch the same teams play again. OSU should not have even sniffed the final 4.
It will be outstanding Clemson D vs outstanding Bama D. Great Clemson offense vs lethargic Alabama offense (if they play like they did today). Gonna be another great natty game, just sucks having to watch the same teams play again. OSU should not have even sniffed the final 4.
I told my nephew a weeks ago Clemson would win by 3TDs. Watched Ohio St play Tulsa and OU. OU beat themselves with their own errors and should have won. Tulsa played them well in a driving rain storm and that game was closer than the score reflected.
You don't win your Conf you are not a champion therefore you shouldn't play in the playoff... proof in the pudding.
Was there a playoff that year? NOPE
How about this shut out baby!! ACC ACC ACC - 8-3
No there was not. Same argument was used however, and it wasn't logical then. So it isn't now, even if I agree that perhaps there were better big 10 choices than OSU this year.
Sent from my Pixel using Tapatalk
I clearly said playoff in my post that you quoted.. if you want to argue something then correct yourself first.
Penn ST was robbed by the committee obviously. What a mismatch this game is. I think I see Urban Meyer faking another heat attack on the sidelines.
I haven't disputed what you said and gave my explanation.
So there is nothing to correct.
Sent from my Pixel using Tapatalk
Exactly.. Penn St was the champ.. they beat OSU clear choice for that spot in the playoff IMO.
Dang it. I'm going to have to turn Doctor Who off and check the score out the way y'all are talking
