2013 MLB Trade deadline and rumors thread

I vote to get rid of the 2nd WC team, back when 1 team was a WC, it was great, the second one dilutes the playoffs, however, to MLB's joy, Bud's joy actually, more teams are in it longer .... and because of it, we get the type of trade deadline we just went thru.
no, the second WC is a must! we don't to go back to September where it doesn't matter because Boston or NY are 5GB up, they want a battle for the Division in September and not a easy way into the playoffs
 
no, the second WC is a must! we don't to go back to September where it doesn't matter because Boston or NY are 5GB up, they want a battle for the Division in September and not a easy way into the playoffs

With the 2nd WC, Boston and NY are almost guaranteed to get into the playoffs in most years.
 
With the 2nd WC, Boston and NY are almost guaranteed to get into the playoffs in most years.
and with that 1 game playoff you can ruin Boston or NY Pitching Rotation, take this year, if Kuroda pitched that 1 game playoff Kuroda can't come back until game 3 or game 4 out of a 5 games series
 
Favorite GM quote at deadline by Pirates Neal Huntington,"We were willing to do something stupid. We just didn't want to do something insane"

Sent from my SGH-T999 using Tapatalk 2
 
The Waiver Trade deadline is 8/31, so we might see some more activity yet...
Very possible.

Usually most of the major trades by contenders are done before the non-waiver deadline. Any major deal after that is usually done between teams not in contention. But this year maybe different because of number of teams that still don't know if they are buyers or seller, and the unknowns about possible suspensions.
 
Very possible.

Usually most of the major trades by contenders are done before the non-waiver deadline. Any major deal after that is usually done between teams not in contention. But this year maybe different because of number of teams that still don't know if they are buyers or seller, and the unknowns about possible suspensions.
Actually, in most cases, at least one of the teams is usually still in contention. Last year's Red Sox/Dodgers megadeal is a prime example...
 
Very possible.

Usually most of the major trades by contenders are done before the non-waiver deadline. Any major deal after that is usually done between teams not in contention. But this year maybe different because of number of teams that still don't know if they are buyers or seller, and the unknowns about possible suspensions.
Tigers picked up Delmon Young from the Twins a few years back this way.
 
Brian Wilson must have been asleep dreaming when he tweeted that he sees himself with the other Dodger greats.
 
Brian Wilson must have been asleep dreaming when he tweeted that he sees himself with the other Dodger greats.
No doubt.

He did do a good job though of matching the faces with the body type. He should have probably switched Fernando's face with Lasorda's though.
 
Pirates acquire Marlon Byrd and John Buck from the Mets....

Two very usable pieces during a pennant race. When I first saw this, I was surprised both cleared waivers considering both contracts are reasonable. Then I remembered the waivers rule that whatever league the waiving team plays (in this case the NL) gets first dibs of the waived player(s) in inverse order of record. Considering the five NL playoff teams are a virtual lock, it's really not a surprise.

If Byrd or Buck were waived by an AL team, you can be sure they would have been harder to get through the logjam of
NYY/BAL/CLE/OAK/TB/TEX/BOS.
 

Sportscenter vs Fox Sports Live

Why are ESPN's Ratings Down?

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 0, Members: 0, Guests: 0)

Who Read This Thread (Total Members: 1)

Latest posts