That must have been painful for you to watch. The look in Dusty's eyes (at least to me) was that he knew he was a goner.
He always has that look.
Sent from my SGH-T999 using Tapatalk 2
That must have been painful for you to watch. The look in Dusty's eyes (at least to me) was that he knew he was a goner.
He always has that look.
Sent from my SGH-T999 using Tapatalk 2
The Reds sucked really hard. If they don't fire Dusty then the same thing will happen next year too.
I would not want to face the Pirates from here on out. Now they REALLY have momentum, steam, whatever you wanna call it. PLUS a whole big piece of the baseball world pulling for them as sentimental underdogs. The fact that have achieved this spot in the playoffs is something no one except the most die-hard Pirates fans saw back in April.2:
I told you Dusty "The Arm Killer" Baker is WAY overrated.
I grew up a Reds fan and have become a BIG Marlins fan. But after the latest Loria debacle, I somewhat switch my allegiances back to the Reds. But last night, being the 40 year anniversary of Roberto Clementes' death...I was sentimentally pulling for the Pirates.
I expected the Reds loss last night. They have played terribly the last month. Congrats to the Pirates fans. You certainly deserved the win last night. They could be dangerous the rest of the way. Look like they are starting to hit well with a lot of pop in the lineup now. Bryd and Morneau were really good additions. Kudos to the Pirates management for picking players that helped them. That's more than I can say about the Reds. They did nothing to help themselves and it showed down the stretch.
Team Stream just announced that 2014 will be Vin Scully's final year as Dodger PBP man. More to follow....
Yes, you can add 'playing in front of your spirited fans' to the HFA attribute list.....:up
Mock all you want. I have facts, history, statistics, and evidence on my side. But I do love the logic fallacies of internet posters using the, "This rock keeps those Tigers away," logic. Must be that same HFA that helped Texas win as well?I thought I read somewhere here that HFA doesn't help the team.
Sent from my SGH-T999 using Tapatalk 2
Mock all you want. I have facts, history, statistics, and evidence on my side. But I do love the logic fallacies of internet posters using the, "This rock keeps those Tigers away," logic. Must be that same HFA that helped Texas win as well?
One game does not a stat make. One series does not a stat make. Collective years and collective games prove this fact that HFA does not provide an advantage. But if you want to keep believing the earth is flat and HFA actually gives teams an advantage, by all means, believe what you want.
If you actually bothered to read what I had posted the other day, you would have realized that we have been talking about the same thing, but looking at it from two different ways.Mock all you want. I have facts, history, statistics, and evidence on my side. But I do love the logic fallacies of internet posters using the, "This rock keeps those Tigers away," logic. Must be that same HFA that helped Texas win as well?
One game does not a stat make. One series does not a stat make. Collective years and collective games prove this fact that HFA does not provide an advantage. But if you want to keep believing the earth is flat and HFA actually gives teams an advantage, by all means, believe what you want.
We cannot technically make any conclusion about the WC round since this is only the second year. We do not have a large enough sample size yet. But the 3 WC games so far, the visiting team won 2 of the 3. Yesterday was the first time the home team won.In the wild card round it does. We have already agreed that home teams have a greater than 50% chance of winning in the MLB. Over a series, when the team with HFA gets 1 extra home game at most the numbers shrink. With these 1 game wild card rounds you would think the same odds as any other game apply though. Meaning, the home team has a greater than 50% chance to win that 1 game series.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD
The ultimate benefit is winning. The only way to really measure the benefit is the measure the success through winning. It does not increase the winning results. The guarantee point is a non sequitur. It has nothing to do with advantage. Guarantee implies total success, a claim nobody is making. Measuring advantage is done by the results. If the results are the same regardless, then there is no advantage.If you actually bothered to read what I had posted the other day, you would have realized that we have been talking about the same thing, but looking at it from two different ways.
When I've been referring to HFA, it's all been about all the benefits the home team has before and during the series. You've been ignoring that and harping strictly on the results, which I've never disputed. Hence, my "That's why it's called a Home Field Advantage, not a Home Field Guarantee...." line. Even if the numbers show it being a statistical dead heat in the end, I would much rather have my team going into a series with the HFA than without it.
We cannot technically make any conclusion about the WC round since this is only the second year. We do not have a large enough sample size yet. But the 3 WC games so far, the visiting team won 2 of the 3. Yesterday was the first time the home team won.
There have been ten 1 game playoffs throughout baseball history, not counting WC games. The home team won 5 and the road team won 5. If you include the 3 WC games played thus far, the visiting team has won 7 of 13. Still a statistical tie. Again, there is no advantage to playing at home or on the road.