South Caroline, and the SEC title game. Just to clarify.
Oh. USC is the University of Southern California. Get it right next time.
South Caroline, and the SEC title game. Just to clarify.
Oh. USC is the University of Southern California. Get it right next time.
msmith198025 said:I thought the topic of the thread was real SEC football, not that hit and giggle stuff that they play elsewhere. It should have been obvious who I meant.
Yes, but the USC Cocks (1801) have been around longer than the USC Trojans (1880).Oh. USC is the University of Southern California. Get it right next time.
It'll be bad for them. That's why I like Georgia being in the east. With Vandy & Kentucky, there's always a break.So what about Mullen and the MSU Bulldogs? I think they will be good, but they picked a bad year to do it with LSU and Bama being stacked.
It happened twice in a row ('08 & '09), #1 vs. #2 with the winner taking the BCS game..Hey smart guy: for a "defacto National Championship Game," wouldn't both teams need a chance to win it all, if they won? The school that is neither USC nor Carolina does not qualify, but nice try.
I thought the topic of the thread was real SEC football, not that hit and giggle stuff that they play elsewhere. It should have been obvious who I meant.
Hit and giggle? You mean like the kind they play in the Big Ten?
as opposed to tattoos and shoveling snow in OhioThere's not much else to do in the South besides cling to your conference and stroke farm animals.
and making excusesas opposed to tattoos and shoveling snow in Ohio
as opposed to tattoos and shoveling snow in Ohio
And destroying other fan's team mailbox covers (I may booby-trap it this year...those things aren't cheap).and making excuses
NO EXPANSION! NO EXPANSION! (please)
Yeah, there's no benefit. You can't have more than 2 teams in the BCS, so no way to expand that gravy train. All an expansion would do is reduce the amount of money per team.NO EXPANSION! NO EXPANSION! (please)