2011 SEC Football (Home of 7 of 13 BCS Championships including the last 5)

Oh. USC is the University of Southern California. Get it right next time.

I thought the topic of the thread was real SEC football, not that hit and giggle stuff that they play elsewhere. It should have been obvious who I meant.
 
msmith198025 said:
I thought the topic of the thread was real SEC football, not that hit and giggle stuff that they play elsewhere. It should have been obvious who I meant.

Only you.

Sent from my galaxy....... far....... far........ away using SatelliteGuys
 
So what about Mullen and the MSU Bulldogs? I think they will be good, but they picked a bad year to do it with LSU and Bama being stacked.
 
So what about Mullen and the MSU Bulldogs? I think they will be good, but they picked a bad year to do it with LSU and Bama being stacked.
It'll be bad for them. That's why I like Georgia being in the east. With Vandy & Kentucky, there's always a break.
 
Hey smart guy: for a "defacto National Championship Game," wouldn't both teams need a chance to win it all, if they won? The school that is neither USC nor Carolina does not qualify, but nice try.
 
Hey smart guy: for a "defacto National Championship Game," wouldn't both teams need a chance to win it all, if they won? The school that is neither USC nor Carolina does not qualify, but nice try.
It happened twice in a row ('08 & '09), #1 vs. #2 with the winner taking the BCS game..
 
NO EXPANSION! NO EXPANSION! (please)
Yeah, there's no benefit. You can't have more than 2 teams in the BCS, so no way to expand that gravy train. All an expansion would do is reduce the amount of money per team.

Just replace Vandy with a real team.
 

Getting around the NFL blackout

Wings blackout on CI

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 0, Members: 0, Guests: 0)

Who Read This Thread (Total Members: 1)