2011 SEC Football (Home of 7 of 13 BCS Championships including the last 5)

As a Tennessee fan and Alum that just saw our football team steamrolled by both this Upcoming Nov 5th matchup should be an epic battle.

Barring one team winning the turnover battle 2+ or more I will give a slight nod to LSU.

Clearly the two best teams in the Country.

Glad CBS was able to move it to primetime.
You just never know. Neither team has faced a defense like they will face against each other. And LSU's defensive stats have certainly benefited from facing Florida, Tennessee, and Auburn while they all had first time starting QBs. As a betting man, I would throw out all previous stats, both on offense and defense, and give the edge to Bama because of Richardson and homefield advantage. As an LSU homer, the Tigers will win in a close one. ;)
 
In anticipation of THE game, figured I would pull this one out again.

coonass.jpg
 
And for those that have not read it, I give you.....the Corn Dog Story.

LSU fans smell just like corn dogs.

Yes, it is often said, but so, so true.

LSU fans do smell like corn dogs.

I would never tell them that to their face though. This is something
better said at internet distances. Even now, I am afraid.

I am afraid that they'll know I said it. I'll walk past an LSU fan
someday, and he'll see that look in my eye that gives it away.
That look that says, "gee, what is that smell? Is it corn dogs?"
The next thing you know, I'll have flat tires on my car.

If you only learn one thing from me today, remember not to tell LSU
fans how they smell - you know, like corn dogs.

LSU fans seem, somehow, sensitive to that whole corn dog issue.

I think this may be why a lot of fans get beaten up by LSU fans. If you
attend a game in Baton Rouge, try to avoid telling them that they smell
like corn dogs. Say something else instead. Like, "Wow, LSU sure does
have a great team this year. This is going to be a great SEC game."

It's hard. I know. It's like when you're having sex and you try to
think about baseball. That corn dog smell is just so overwhelming.
It makes it hard for you to think about football or baseball or
whatever else. Your brain wanders into corn dog topics like: "Gee, I
wonder if I took a bite of your finger, if you would taste just like
a corn dog?"; or "Is this a real person or is it a giant corn dog trying
to make me think it is a real person?" or "What did that giant corn dog
just say?" or "Excuse me, Mister, why is it that you smell just exactly
like corn dogs smell?" or, of course, after a silencer:
"Madam, did you just let the corn dogs out?"

Heck, after what I've heard about LSU fans, I think it may be better
not to smell them at all. Okay, not all of them. Some of them are
nice. Sure. Smell the nice ones. That's okay.

You know what else is a bad thing to do? Holding your nose around them.
They are real sensitive to that, too. Try holding your breath. But
don't be obvious about it. Somehow they know you're trying not to
breathe in the corn dog smell. And that offends them. They'll likely
punch you for that if they catch on to what you're doing.

If you do breathe it in long enough, though, it'll permeate your whole
body, and then you'll smell like a corn dog just like they do. But
don't say, "Dang, now I smell like a corn dog." They take offense to
that. And they will throw things. But not corn dogs. Hard stuff.
Stuff that leaves bruises and makes you bleed. Then you may have to get
stitches or something. Just don't say it. If you do start smelling like
a corn dog, just shut up about it. Okay?

I think kids are acutely aware of corn dog smells too. Counsel your
kids on how to behave around LSU fans. If LSU fans are driving around
town, do not let your kids stick their heads out of your car window and
sniff the air. No. Keep your windows rolled up. An odd change in
their expression - indicating they smell corn dogs - might get a wrench
or pipe or some other object tossed at your windshield. So, that's
dangerous. Let your kids stick their heads out of the car windows as
you drive - on some other weekend

I know you are just as puzzled as I am about some of this corn dog
stuff. What puzzles me most is that I've never actually seen any of
these LSU fans with a corn dog in their hand. Okay, maybe there's no
mystery there - maybe they already ate the corn dogs. Who knows?
Maybe there's a corn dog factory in Baton Rouge and they all work there.
Maybe, there's a corn dog lotion that they wear, or a French perfume.

Maybe their city council puts corn dog juice in the water supply -
kind of like fluoride. The politics there are probably weird.
The big political issue during the city election is whether they should
add more ketchup or more mustard to the water. Don't comment on it
though. It's not politically correct over there. It's like a
malnutrition issue or something. It's like the corn dogs are probably
added to the water to prevent starvation or something.

I know when you go to Baton Rouge, you're thinking: "Ahhhh. Here I am
in Baton Rouge, Louisiana. I'll bet the people here smell just like
boiled crawfish or shrimp etoufe' or some fancy Cajun food." But just
stop thinking that. That's just a myth. They smell just like corn dogs.

In fact, please listen to my advice. Leave them alone about the corn
dog odor. And don't try masking the odor with something stronger.
They'll curse at you. They'll say something like: "WTF, how dare you
smoke a cigar in my home," or "WTF!! Are you too good for the smell of
corn dogs?" and they'll cuss out your kids too: "WTF!!! Little Mister
fancy pants over here acts like he doesn't want to smell like corn dogs."

Cajuns are not like us. Don't you see that, yet? They are really
sensitive about being sniffed and about their corn dog aroma. They know
they smell like corn dogs and it is no laughing matter to them at all.
I know, I know. We sniff the Bammers and the UGA Dawgs and the Ole
messes, and we keep a straight face with each of them, but don't press
your luck with the Cajun tiger fans. Don't refer to Death Valley as corn
dog valley either. I mean that's just wrong. Even if you've been
drinking, they'll beat you up and curse out your kids.

Along these lines, be extra careful when you laugh in their direction -
even if you're laughing about something else. Like baseball or football,
or sex or whatever. If you can't control yourself and you must laugh
though, do not snort. The snorting makes them think that you smell their
corn dog body odor from a distance or that you're choking on it or
something. They'll likely burn your van for that. We lost a campus
building over just one snort.

So, just remember. You can love one another without sniffing each
other. You can enjoy the clash of a couple of good football teams.
You can enjoy the thrill of the rivalry. But after the game, please heed
my words. Please just move along. No sniffing the opposing fans this
Saturday. Okay? Get your corn dog jollies at home.

Enough with this corn dog talk. Let's play ball...
 
Deaton indicates Mizzou departure imminent but complex
Posted: Tuesday, October 25, 2011 11:15 am
Despite no clear, or at least no publicized, action regarding Mizzou's athletics affiliation coming out of the Big 12 Board of Directors meeting on Monday in Dallas, MU chancellor Brady Deaton left little doubt Tuesday morning that change is imminent.During his regularly scheduled monthly radio appearance on KFRU in Columbia, Deaton said he spent most of that meeting outside the room and abstained from voting and that there is no fluidity in MU's strategy now as it appears bound for the Southeastern Conference."There has been a coalescing of view on what is best for the University of Missouri longer-term, and that's really driving where we're heading right now," said Deaton, who earlier said, "We've reached a firmness in where we are headed, where we want to analyze and focus our attention."Asked by host David Lile if he could assess a time frame on a resolution, Deaton said, "Our hopes were days, possibly a week or two. We're hoping the sooner the better."While MU's intent is rather clear, paving the way is another matter at play from multiple angles.Among other key issues likely requiring negotiation would be departure fees and the timetable:Whether it's merely posturing for negotiating purposes or not, the Big 12 has indicated it wants MU to stay for 2012 because of criteria it needs to meet for inventory for its football television contracts.The Big 12 seems to have targeted one or more Big East schools as potential replacements and may look to go back to 12 if MU becomes the fourth school to leave in just over a year, but the Big East has indicated through its actions with Pittsburgh and Syracuse that it would hold members to a 27-month departure time frame.The implications of legal snares in turn could leave the SEC delaying an acceptance of a MU application until all such matters are reconciled."Involved in these steps that are being taken at this point are two conferences, two boards of directors, two sets of legal counsel, two sets of financial analyses, or three, if you count the University separate from the Big 12, and then you have a commissioner in whichever conference you're dealing with," he said. "They're complex issues, and we have to look at a wide range of issues affecting our student-athletes, travel, financial issues, future security, stability of the conference."And what we're trying to do in other areas such as developing private development funds depends on the environment you're setting within the institution. And so these issues, such as stability, take on very, very important long-term meaning, and we're trying to look ahead at where we're going as a University and where the Big 12 is going, where the SEC is going and where the world of sports entertainment is going, for that matter."And we're analyzing each of those issues very carefully. These are not decisions that can just be made at the press of a button."And I know I've said this before, but my point here, I think for the public and alums to hopefully understand is, we are not delaying anything beyond what has to be delayed to make the right decision for the University of Missouri. And we're absolutely committed to that."Still, Deaton said Mizzou was working on just such issues even as he spoke."There's a significant amount going on at every moment, from very early in the morning," said Deaton, who greeted reporters waiting for him after the show but left in a hurry and essentially declined further comment. "I've already been on the phone earlier this morning with critical individuals in the analysis with new information coming forward, with commitments to continue the discussion later in the day, and hopefully have some of them resolved even by the end of this day."Asked about his words Monday night at Columbia Regional Airport indicating a farewell to the Big 12 ("I wish them the best, and all of that," he told KOMU TV),Even Deaton's clarification pointed to MU being outside the group."I have no doubt that I said just that," he said. "As I'm leaving an airport after a long, long day, thinking of the fact that I was actually outside the principle meeting of the Big 12 the last several hours that I was in Dallas because they were undertaking business that I needed to step away from ... it's very easy to get into a `they' kind of comment."Clearly, we will be part of the Big 12 as long as we remain as a competitor within the Big 12."Of the meeting, he added: "So while it's a bit cool because everyone understands that there's only certain things that I can say in this environment, it's cool but definitely professional and friendly in that respect."Deaton said a move to the SEC would not be just about money, which an MU analysis leaked to The Associated Press said would mean at least $2 million more a year and potentially up to $12 million more annually than the $17.16 it projects to make in the Big 12 next year."Let me say, a lot of people point to the fact that this is just about money. That could not be, I don't want to say farther from the truth, (but) that simply is not the case," he said. "As we are looking at alternatives here, the financial considerations are not the principle considerations."Looking to long-term stability, for an environment for the University of Missouri to prosper, for our student-athletes to reach their highest, most effective level of competitiveness, with clarity of where we're going as a University, are really the most important overriding factors that we're looking at."Deaton, who resigned as chairman of the Big 12 board earlier this month, said he understands the feelings of those who might be torn, alluding to a head vs. heart question posed in a column by Columbia Daily Tribune sports editor Joe Walljasper."Let me just say, I was very touched by that statement, because I think it does reflect a lot of what we're seeing across the state," he said. "There's a deep warmth for the history of this tradition of playing in the Big Six, the Big Eight and now the Big 12. ..."We've been a member of this conference from its beginning. And so changing something like that is significant, and emotional attachment by a lot of people is very real. We listen to that very carefully."The world of course is changing very, very drastically, as the University of Missouri has changed, and coming to terms with those changes is very much a part of what we're all about."And as often is the case, our head has to outweigh our heart in achieving some of the objectives, because the heart won't necessarily in this case lead to where the University is going and needs to be going."Asked if a decision on conference alignment would be part of his legacy, Deaton said: "I've thought of the importance of it in terms of the longterm self-awareness and public perception of the university, yes, but my legacy, I hope, will be the academic excellence of the University of Missouri. That's what I've devoted my entire career to, and that goes far beyond this issue that we're dealing with today."He went on to call the faculty of MU "the pride and joy and, literally, the future of this state and nation."As for the when the future of MU's athletics affiliation will literally be known, Deaton declined Lile's invitation to announce it during the show, albeit with a slight slip."I'd love to come back, as soon as we annou. ..."He caught himself before completing the word and added, "as soon as we've reached conclusion on this, I'd love to be back here with you."Asked if he would feel relieved when the process is behind, Deaton said:"We will feel a new surge of excitement about the future irrespective of the direction of the decisions, and we will do that with conviction, with support and with a sure sense that we have made a decision that's in the best interest of the University of Missouri."Lile also asked Deaton about the status of men's basketball coach Frank Haith, who was accused by a University of Miami booster of condoning a $10,000 payment to a player."I have been in touch with (NCAA president) Mark Emmert on more than one occasion regarding this matter, and we're fully participating, cooperating with the NCAA ... and we're also pledged to say no more than that at this time."Read more: Deaton indicates Mizzou departure imminent but complex
 
Deaton indicates Mizzou departure imminent but complex
Posted: Tuesday, October 25, 2011 11:15 am
Despite no clear, or at least no publicized, action regarding Mizzou's athletics affiliation coming out of the Big 12 Board of Directors meeting on Monday in Dallas, MU chancellor Brady Deaton left little doubt Tuesday morning that change is imminent.During his regularly scheduled monthly radio appearance on KFRU in Columbia, Deaton said he spent most of that meeting outside the room and abstained from voting and that there is no fluidity in MU's strategy now as it appears bound for the Southeastern Conference."There has been a coalescing of view on what is best for the University of Missouri longer-term, and that's really driving where we're heading right now," said Deaton, who earlier said, "We've reached a firmness in where we are headed, where we want to analyze and focus our attention."Asked by host David Lile if he could assess a time frame on a resolution, Deaton said, "Our hopes were days, possibly a week or two. We're hoping the sooner the better."While MU's intent is rather clear, paving the way is another matter at play from multiple angles.Among other key issues likely requiring negotiation would be departure fees and the timetable:Whether it's merely posturing for negotiating purposes or not, the Big 12 has indicated it wants MU to stay for 2012 because of criteria it needs to meet for inventory for its football television contracts.The Big 12 seems to have targeted one or more Big East schools as potential replacements and may look to go back to 12 if MU becomes the fourth school to leave in just over a year, but the Big East has indicated through its actions with Pittsburgh and Syracuse that it would hold members to a 27-month departure time frame.The implications of legal snares in turn could leave the SEC delaying an acceptance of a MU application until all such matters are reconciled."Involved in these steps that are being taken at this point are two conferences, two boards of directors, two sets of legal counsel, two sets of financial analyses, or three, if you count the University separate from the Big 12, and then you have a commissioner in whichever conference you're dealing with," he said. "They're complex issues, and we have to look at a wide range of issues affecting our student-athletes, travel, financial issues, future security, stability of the conference."And what we're trying to do in other areas such as developing private development funds depends on the environment you're setting within the institution. And so these issues, such as stability, take on very, very important long-term meaning, and we're trying to look ahead at where we're going as a University and where the Big 12 is going, where the SEC is going and where the world of sports entertainment is going, for that matter."And we're analyzing each of those issues very carefully. These are not decisions that can just be made at the press of a button."And I know I've said this before, but my point here, I think for the public and alums to hopefully understand is, we are not delaying anything beyond what has to be delayed to make the right decision for the University of Missouri. And we're absolutely committed to that."Still, Deaton said Mizzou was working on just such issues even as he spoke."There's a significant amount going on at every moment, from very early in the morning," said Deaton, who greeted reporters waiting for him after the show but left in a hurry and essentially declined further comment. "I've already been on the phone earlier this morning with critical individuals in the analysis with new information coming forward, with commitments to continue the discussion later in the day, and hopefully have some of them resolved even by the end of this day."Asked about his words Monday night at Columbia Regional Airport indicating a farewell to the Big 12 ("I wish them the best, and all of that," he told KOMU TV),Even Deaton's clarification pointed to MU being outside the group."I have no doubt that I said just that," he said. "As I'm leaving an airport after a long, long day, thinking of the fact that I was actually outside the principle meeting of the Big 12 the last several hours that I was in Dallas because they were undertaking business that I needed to step away from ... it's very easy to get into a `they' kind of comment."Clearly, we will be part of the Big 12 as long as we remain as a competitor within the Big 12."Of the meeting, he added: "So while it's a bit cool because everyone understands that there's only certain things that I can say in this environment, it's cool but definitely professional and friendly in that respect."Deaton said a move to the SEC would not be just about money, which an MU analysis leaked to The Associated Press said would mean at least $2 million more a year and potentially up to $12 million more annually than the $17.16 it projects to make in the Big 12 next year."Let me say, a lot of people point to the fact that this is just about money. That could not be, I don't want to say farther from the truth, (but) that simply is not the case," he said. "As we are looking at alternatives here, the financial considerations are not the principle considerations."Looking to long-term stability, for an environment for the University of Missouri to prosper, for our student-athletes to reach their highest, most effective level of competitiveness, with clarity of where we're going as a University, are really the most important overriding factors that we're looking at."Deaton, who resigned as chairman of the Big 12 board earlier this month, said he understands the feelings of those who might be torn, alluding to a head vs. heart question posed in a column by Columbia Daily Tribune sports editor Joe Walljasper."Let me just say, I was very touched by that statement, because I think it does reflect a lot of what we're seeing across the state," he said. "There's a deep warmth for the history of this tradition of playing in the Big Six, the Big Eight and now the Big 12. ..."We've been a member of this conference from its beginning. And so changing something like that is significant, and emotional attachment by a lot of people is very real. We listen to that very carefully."The world of course is changing very, very drastically, as the University of Missouri has changed, and coming to terms with those changes is very much a part of what we're all about."And as often is the case, our head has to outweigh our heart in achieving some of the objectives, because the heart won't necessarily in this case lead to where the University is going and needs to be going."Asked if a decision on conference alignment would be part of his legacy, Deaton said: "I've thought of the importance of it in terms of the longterm self-awareness and public perception of the university, yes, but my legacy, I hope, will be the academic excellence of the University of Missouri. That's what I've devoted my entire career to, and that goes far beyond this issue that we're dealing with today."He went on to call the faculty of MU "the pride and joy and, literally, the future of this state and nation."As for the when the future of MU's athletics affiliation will literally be known, Deaton declined Lile's invitation to announce it during the show, albeit with a slight slip."I'd love to come back, as soon as we annou. ..."He caught himself before completing the word and added, "as soon as we've reached conclusion on this, I'd love to be back here with you."Asked if he would feel relieved when the process is behind, Deaton said:"We will feel a new surge of excitement about the future irrespective of the direction of the decisions, and we will do that with conviction, with support and with a sure sense that we have made a decision that's in the best interest of the University of Missouri."Lile also asked Deaton about the status of men's basketball coach Frank Haith, who was accused by a University of Miami booster of condoning a $10,000 payment to a player."I have been in touch with (NCAA president) Mark Emmert on more than one occasion regarding this matter, and we're fully participating, cooperating with the NCAA ... and we're also pledged to say no more than that at this time."Read more: Deaton indicates Mizzou departure imminent but complex

OMGwallofletterswhatdoesitsay?

Translation -

Wall of letters, what does it say??

:rolleyes::rolleyes:!sadroll!sadroll!sadroll:wtf::wtf::wtf::tsk::tsk::tsk::no:no:no!protest!protest!protest
 
WAH .....

You guys throw your sec, sec, sec into the Big Ten thread at any opportunity

And YOU guys started your Big Ten thread to have your own section first. So there...lol:D
Even used the keep others out disclaimer first. Just saying
Honestly I never understood why it couldnt all go in the main thread, but its fine.

Edit: Ive looked at the Big Ten thread often, I havent seen any overly intrusive SEC posts like you imply. There might have been a few joking posts, but nothing that suggests it is done at "every opportunity". To be clear, I dont mind your post that you put, I was simply picking with you and using the "keep other discussions post" as a joking point.
 
And YOU guys started your Big Ten thread to have your own section first. So there...lol:D
Even used the keep others out disclaimer first. Just saying
Honestly I never understood why it couldnt all go in the main thread, but its fine.

Edit: Ive looked at the Big Ten thread often, I havent seen any overly intrusive SEC posts like you imply. There might have been a few joking posts, but nothing that suggests it is done at "every opportunity". To be clear, I dont mind your post that you put, I was simply picking with you and using the "keep other discussions post" as a joking point.

Wow.
 
I still don't get the whole corndog thing. I've never heard anyone bring it up at home or away games. Just see it posted every now and then by some Gump or Hawg. Trailer humor I guess. :D
 
Last edited:
I still don't get the whole corndog thing. I've never heard anyone bring it up at home or away games. Just see it posted every now and then by some Gump or Hawg. Trailer humor I guess. :D

I hear it often, but it is mainly by Ole Miss fans, and Bama fans. Occasionally by other members of the West, rarely from the East.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 0, Members: 0, Guests: 0)

Who Read This Thread (Total Members: 1)

Latest posts

Top