2010 NCAA Football Season
- Thread starter Ronnie-
- Start date
- Latest activity Latest activity:
- Replies 3K
- Views 155K
Not with the way they split them. Unless I am thinking wrong.
Splitting on a geographical point (north/south) makes sense. Not sure why the big ten didn't do this
Sent from my SCH-I500 using Tapatalk
Not really, if you want to keep traditional games alive.
E/W wont work and N/S would do well either.
Because the Big 10 didn't divide the divisions based on geographical location. They split them up on balance of power.
The problem with that though is in college you never know who will be the power. I mean who would of thought wisconsin, mich st and ohio st splitting the title this year?
I understand that and didnt make my point clear I guess. I think they could have done a geographical split of some sort, since team power will shift all the time.
Last edited:
I used n/s as an example. E/W, Great Lakes/Heartland (or whatever), National/American (not really a geographical split, but IMO would have sounded better than what they came up with).
They really don't need a name, as long as you know who's in what division.
I see nothing wrong with the names they gave them.
It wouldn't be N and S as the majority of them are all in the same area north and south wise.
I actually LIKE your idea of Great Lakes and Heartland, now THAT could work.
Yeah, they should have hired me
Or me. I still say Leaders and Losers has a nice ring to it! hehehe
Yeah, they should have hired me
Sorry, they would have never hired you
Your from the SOUTH !
Sorry, they would have never hired you
Your from the SOUTH !
Listen here yankee!!!!!!
:rant::rant::rant:
As if things weren't confusing enough with 12 teams in the Big "10". Now "Legends and Leaders"? Two divisions that sound similar in name will make it difficult to remember what teams are where for fans outside of the conference. The "Legends" division sounds a little condescending as well...are they the teams that were once good but suck now? Ridiculous if you ask me.Legends vs Leaders the new big ten setup? Who in the world came up with this??? lol
Why can't the powers-that-be in this conference quit living in the past?
Last edited:
I agree with this too. Actually has the aspect of "team location" involved. First thing I've heard that makes sense. Too bad the clowns in charge didn't come up with it.
Similar threads
