Hello, guys!
I have three DiSEqC 1.2/USALS receivers (rather do not ask me why: one of them is due to a provider that bounds its smart card to its own STB, so the "clever" investment in STBs with CIs does not looks so clever at the end). But the problem exists even if you have only two DiSEqC 1.2/USALS receivers (i.e. more than one, to be short).
The dish with single LNB is rotated by STAB-USALS HH100 motor.
From the beginning I use USALS mode.
After some time experimenting (!%&$#) I found (harder way, see "!%&$#") solution where only one receiver can drive the motor, others are set to think they have business with a fixed dish.
But I do not like this solution as I have extra steps each time I want to change satellite while watching over the "fixed" boxes, i.e. I have to do it via the "master" box.
Is out there a really elegant solution, the one that completely solves the problem? (no jokes, please, it hurts )
I am relatively a newbie in matters of DiSEqC: I have a thin idea but it's maybe founded on my wrong (learn, learn) assumptions:
1) Assume all receivers are set to DiSEqC 1.2 mode (not USALS!);
2) if I find and store (Store Position nn) several sat positions with the "master" box
AND
if the positions are physically stored at the motor side
AND
the other boxes has an identical list and order of the stored satellites
THEN
it' shouldn't matter which box will send "Drive motor to Position nn", right? (probably not, I feel it...)
For example, selecting program "XYZ" at any box will result in looking up to its own stored satellite list and resulting in sending the very same "Restore Position nn" to the motor.
Basically, I do not understand (see under: wrong assumptions) why it has not already worked in 3xUSALS mode if each box was sending absolute angle position (reduced somewhere to my LONG/LAT), i.e. with "Goto x.x deg" command.
Please help!
I have three DiSEqC 1.2/USALS receivers (rather do not ask me why: one of them is due to a provider that bounds its smart card to its own STB, so the "clever" investment in STBs with CIs does not looks so clever at the end). But the problem exists even if you have only two DiSEqC 1.2/USALS receivers (i.e. more than one, to be short).
The dish with single LNB is rotated by STAB-USALS HH100 motor.
From the beginning I use USALS mode.
After some time experimenting (!%&$#) I found (harder way, see "!%&$#") solution where only one receiver can drive the motor, others are set to think they have business with a fixed dish.
But I do not like this solution as I have extra steps each time I want to change satellite while watching over the "fixed" boxes, i.e. I have to do it via the "master" box.
Is out there a really elegant solution, the one that completely solves the problem? (no jokes, please, it hurts )
I am relatively a newbie in matters of DiSEqC: I have a thin idea but it's maybe founded on my wrong (learn, learn) assumptions:
1) Assume all receivers are set to DiSEqC 1.2 mode (not USALS!);
2) if I find and store (Store Position nn) several sat positions with the "master" box
AND
if the positions are physically stored at the motor side
AND
the other boxes has an identical list and order of the stored satellites
THEN
it' shouldn't matter which box will send "Drive motor to Position nn", right? (probably not, I feel it...)
For example, selecting program "XYZ" at any box will result in looking up to its own stored satellite list and resulting in sending the very same "Restore Position nn" to the motor.
Basically, I do not understand (see under: wrong assumptions) why it has not already worked in 3xUSALS mode if each box was sending absolute angle position (reduced somewhere to my LONG/LAT), i.e. with "Goto x.x deg" command.
Please help!