Why does anybody put their computer at risk by buying no-name "$10 special" power supplies?
For example, my boss always complained that office computer was always "overheating" and would crash if he left it on for extended periods. When I got around to look it at, I found out he had a top of the line custom built PC...in a cheap generic case powered by an no-name power supply with a ridiculous spec label. The gauge of all the power wires was thinner than standard and the mobo was hooked up through a 20-to-24 adapter...
Anyhow, the moral of the story is one Antec Earthwatts power supply later all of the random problems and "overheating" is gone.
I understand that the general public isn't aware of what difference a quality power supply makes, but shouldn't hardware shops show some ethics and stop selling/bundling PSUs from shady vendors. It's one thing to build a power supply from the cheapest components possible. It's another thing to play games with specifications and present a misleading label. But it's altogether wrong to sell "500W" PSUs that fail at less than 50% load and reveal on teardown that the components used could barely theoretically be called a 250W supply. (see How Much Power Can a Generic 500 W Power Supply Really Deliver? | Hardware Secrets for an expose of one such unit)
I know computer techs make good easy money from the inevitable failure of cheap PSUs, and I'm no fan of government regulation, but wouldn't it be good public policy to require PSUs to at least make 80-plus certification?
For example, my boss always complained that office computer was always "overheating" and would crash if he left it on for extended periods. When I got around to look it at, I found out he had a top of the line custom built PC...in a cheap generic case powered by an no-name power supply with a ridiculous spec label. The gauge of all the power wires was thinner than standard and the mobo was hooked up through a 20-to-24 adapter...
Anyhow, the moral of the story is one Antec Earthwatts power supply later all of the random problems and "overheating" is gone.
I understand that the general public isn't aware of what difference a quality power supply makes, but shouldn't hardware shops show some ethics and stop selling/bundling PSUs from shady vendors. It's one thing to build a power supply from the cheapest components possible. It's another thing to play games with specifications and present a misleading label. But it's altogether wrong to sell "500W" PSUs that fail at less than 50% load and reveal on teardown that the components used could barely theoretically be called a 250W supply. (see How Much Power Can a Generic 500 W Power Supply Really Deliver? | Hardware Secrets for an expose of one such unit)
I know computer techs make good easy money from the inevitable failure of cheap PSUs, and I'm no fan of government regulation, but wouldn't it be good public policy to require PSUs to at least make 80-plus certification?