This makes no sense to me. I brought it up at AVS, but someone decided to go completely off-topic thinking it was a discussion about whether I wanted to fill the screen or not.
My concern is rather simple: by sending a 4:3 signal in a 16:9 format, it's like false advertising. Many of us have different settings on our displays for 4:3 vs 16:9 content and this completely bypasses the ability to use those.
For the many folks out there with 4:3 native projectors, it's worse. Their widescreen is letterboxed to show OAR (as everything should be, ahem). But this "upconverted" 4:3 content is still 16:9 according to the signal and gets relegated to only the center portion of the letterboxed area. This leaves the image with less resolution and size than it would have had originally.
My concern is rather simple: by sending a 4:3 signal in a 16:9 format, it's like false advertising. Many of us have different settings on our displays for 4:3 vs 16:9 content and this completely bypasses the ability to use those.
For the many folks out there with 4:3 native projectors, it's worse. Their widescreen is letterboxed to show OAR (as everything should be, ahem). But this "upconverted" 4:3 content is still 16:9 according to the signal and gets relegated to only the center portion of the letterboxed area. This leaves the image with less resolution and size than it would have had originally.