Wikipedia has been shown to include errors of fact or omission. I use Wikipedia for a general understanding of the subject content, then move on to other sources to see what seems to stack-up (i.e., general consensus). Often the links included in the Wikipedia articles are a good place to start. I think Wikipedia is a great, easy-to-access resource for many situations, but I would never bet the farm on ANYTHING in there. IOW, when it really counts, get a second (or more!) opinion...