LMAO@ my spelling and your comment....Yep, they certainly are flexible, especially if you put a little muscle into it.
LMAO@ my spelling and your comment....Yep, they certainly are flexible, especially if you put a little muscle into it.
If they did not want to have dish as eligible then they should not have been in the running at all. Not at the last minute just so they would not win.
Is CNET an objective electronics news magazine/blog, or a corporate shill for CBS/Viacomm?
But anyone who knows anything about the topic will know that it was a bs decision and realize how petty CBS and CNET are based off of this decision. Any informed consumer will look into a product before purchasing anyways and most likely see something regarding this non sense.
But actually they will probably get more attention over this than they would winning the award.
Looks like a bomb went off in the news media.... started picking it up all of a sudden
http://www.deadline.com/2013/01/cbs-cnet-dish-network-hopper-best-ces-award/
http://allthingsd.com/20130110/cnet-wanders-into-the-cbs-dish-crossfire-at-ces/
http://blogs.wsj.com/digits/2013/01/10/dish-recorder-snubbed-for-cnet-award-over-cbs-legal-scuffle/
The "news media"? those are all weblogs that are covering CES, not mainstream. This will be nothing more than a blip in the news cycle.
I'll bet you love BGR.
I don't know why you are all defending Dish.
I don't blame CBS one bit in their decision. When your in a lawsuit, why would you do anything to benefit the person you are trying to sue.
Where this will hurt dish is that they will not be able to promote the hopper as winning an award, and it may cost them a few potential customers who research before they buy.
Sure it is a nice product, but still just a satellite receiver. not like anyone could not live without it. Big money flexing it's mussels, bottom line.
I fully support CBS/Cnet in excluding Dish from their competition if they want. It is theirs, have at it.
However, I also think they come across as looking childish, and IMO, they have damaged their reputation by doing so in the manner that they did.
It will certainly cause me to second guess CNet as a reputable source for my technological reviews given the reason the given for the exclusion.
clarification.Why would you support them in this? This is essentially CNET announcing to the world that they have no journalistic objectivity. It's like a judge admitting he's on the take.