I agree with those saying that this is probably a dispute between Dish and the networks. My guess is that the networks want more money to have certain channels included in the HD only packs and Dish does not agree with the price. One thing we know about Dish, they will do damn near anything to "win" programming disputes. I'm sure in this case Dish is saying, "fine, we won't include channel X in our HD only packages."
The problem with this method, IMHO, is that Dish ends up losing more $$ through lost customers by being stubborn than if they were to just meet the networks somewhere in the middle.
I mean, if you're going to have HD only packages then give subs all of the HD channels. It's like having a "sports only" package and not giving subs all of the sports channels.
Oh well, T.I.D.
The problem with this method, IMHO, is that Dish ends up losing more $$ through lost customers by being stubborn than if they were to just meet the networks somewhere in the middle.
I mean, if you're going to have HD only packages then give subs all of the HD channels. It's like having a "sports only" package and not giving subs all of the sports channels.
Oh well, T.I.D.