You should really see how things are ran in the KC area..lol We need FSM's premission (which we never get) to mount on living areas, we have to try for non living areas. To make it worse, we have to grd every apartment install as well which as i'm sure u all know it's not very easy.[/QUOTEIn the event the FSM declines the over-the-living-area placement. Then what? You blow off the job?.. I work for a DNSC contractor. We are in touch with the GM of the local DNS office. The standing procedure is "get the jobs done". No limits on where a dish can be placed. Roof, pole, ect...Doesn't matter. Apartment jobs are not QC'd...An absence of a suitable ground is no excuse to leave the job undone. The customer signs off on the no-ground and is advised this could be risky. Notes are added to the account indicating the lack of a NEC ground.
Some apartment comlexes actually prohibit using the building's electrical ground...Can ya believe that?
The criteria that prevent apartment installs are: No free standing (tripod ,bucket) mounts. Limited placement choices creating LOS issues..Otherwise, they get done..
This roof issue seems to vary from place to place. I don't understand why in certain areas DNSC offices are choosing ot ignore Dish protocol for roof mounts and putting a virtual ban on them.I'd hate to be at the meeting with the head honcho when he asks why completion numbers don't look so good..I would hate t be the one to have to explain that..
"Oh yeah. We're not dong jobs because of LOS issues. I am summarily refusing to allow my techs to mount a dish to a roof above the living area. I realize that limits install options but I am looking at the potential problems a rof mount can create. yes I realize I could take the time to properly train my people to seal roof mounts. But I don't have time to do all that"...
Now look at the abpove scenario..If you were the DNSC office GM's boss and the GM told you what is in quotes above, what would your reaction be?