Tiger Woods checks into sex rehab facility in misssissippi

Status
Not open for further replies.
You can stop addressing me now, and get back to the subject at hand. The personal jibes are totally unnecessary.

Please stop. Thank you.


Sandra
There are three ways to tell when his argument is lost:

1). He clams up
2). He alters the original argument
3). He resorts to personal attacks

Looks like we've seen two of the three methods here.... :(
 
Ernie Els says timing of event "selfish"

The timing of Tiger Woods' first appearance since his car accident and subsequent admission of martial infidelity -- on Friday in Florida, while the WGC-Accenture Match Play Championship is in full swing in Arizona -- does not impress one of the game's best-known players.

"It's selfish," former U.S. Open and British Open champion Ernie Els told Golfweek magazine. "You can write that. I feel sorry for the sponsor. Mondays are a good day to make statements, not Friday. This takes a lot away from the golf tournament."

Ernie Els says timing of Tiger Woods announcement 'selfish' - ESPN
 
I also didn't realize your focus was specific to the initial response only. That's why I brought up Andy Pettitte.


Sandra

I have stated....that the famous will not give a Q&A when they make 1st response to scandal....NOT in their best interest.

...that is why I stated in post #247 when bitching started about HOW he was doing this....this how it has ALWAYS been done....and I doubt it will ever change.
 
You can stop addressing me now, and get back to the subject at hand. The personal jibes are totally unnecessary.

Please stop. Thank you.


Sandra

I only address those who address me. IF you are going to call someone out or call out their statements....then you will be addressed.

Please stop the "why is he picking on me" bit because it is a bit worn out.

Like I said, you are more than welcome to put me in ignore.
 
There are three ways to tell when his argument is lost:

1). He clams up. I have never clammed up....the total amount of my post DISPUEST that statement completely.
2). He alters the original argument. I do not alter my statements. You guys just do not like nor agree with what I say....and need to some kind of justification to disagree. My argument in this thread has remained the same and has never changed.
3). He resorts to personal attacks. I do not attack the person, I attack the statement. AND go back to #2 about folks not liking my comments.;)

Looks like we've seen two of the three methods here.... :(

Again....you see what you want to see.:(
 
I only address those who address me. IF you are going to call someone out or call out their statements....then you will be addressed.

Please stop the "why is he picking on me" bit because it is a bit worn out.

Like I said, you are more than welcome to put me in ignore.

You asked people to name one person and I named Andy Pettitte. That's not 'calling you out', and I did not include anything personal about you in my Pettitte post.

But that's when you got personal. :rolleyes:


Sandra
 
You asked people to name one person and I named Andy Pettitte. That's not 'calling you out', and I did not include anything personal about you in my Pettitte post.

But that's when you got personal. :rolleyes:


Sandra

I asked ONE person that did NOT use the tactic that Tiger was using NOW....and ONE ONE could come up with one. I CLEARLY stated that in post #247

Again when has a celebrity EVER caught in a scandal NOT done it this way?

And I added links CLEARLY making your comments....null and void.
 
I asked ONE person that did NOT use the tactic that Tiger was using NOW....and ONE ONE could come up with one. I CLEARLY stated that in post #247

And I added links CLEARLY making your comments....null and void.

Oh my God we're getting all circular again...I don't even know what you just said. :rolleyes:

Just stop talking about me, and start talking about the subject.

Please.


Sandra
 
Oh my God we're getting all circular again...I don't even know what you just said. :rolleyes:

Just stop talking about me, and start talking about the subject.

Please.


Sandra

I LOVE IT!!! LMAO!!

Your just looking for the answer you want. Not diffcult at all. It's quite simple really....

1. The thread basically was dead until Tiger's folks announced he was making a statement and it came to life.

2. EVERYONE that came in bitched that there was not gonna be any Q/A in this psuedo press conference AND wanted blood.

3. I clearly stated that EVERY single celebrity that has gotten into some scandal, has ALWAYS done their initial contact to the public this way.

4. I asked to name ONE that has not done it this way.....ALL named folks that were brought up did their Q/A AFTER the initial prepared statement by either their rep/awyer.


See....no circles, very simple. Problem, ain't the answers you wanted.
 
I LOVE IT!!! LMAO!!

Your just looking for the answer you want. Not diffcult at all. It's quite simple really....

1. The thread basically was dead until Tiger's folks announced he was making a statement and it came to life.

2. EVERYONE that came in bitched that there was not gonna be any Q/A in this psuedo press conference AND wanted blood.

3. I clearly stated that EVERY single celebrity that has gotten into some scandal, has ALWAYS done their initial contact to the public this way.

4. I asked to name ONE that has not done it this way.....ALL named folks that were brought up did their Q/A AFTER the initial prepared statement by either their rep/awyer.


See....no circles, very simple. Problem, ain't the answers you wanted.

If that's all it was, if it was all about sports, I would not be asking you to go back to talking about sports. The point is, during all of this you got personal with me.

Please stop. Thank you.


Sandra
 
:rolleyes:
If that's all it was, if it was all about sports, I would not be asking you to go back to talking about sports. The point is, during all of this you got personal with me.

Please stop. Thank you.


Sandra

You called out my post, I posted links showing you that you were wrong and now you are accussing me of personally attacking you.....?:confused:

classic...typical...:rolleyes:

"....NEXT TIME, get you FACTS STRAIGHT before you make yourself look foolish"

That statement clearly states to do your homework.

Done with this portion of the discussion.
 
You called out my post, I posted links showing you that you were wrong and now you are accussing me of personally attacking you.....?

classic...typical...

"....NEXT TIME, get you FACTS STRAIGHT before you make yourself look foolish"

That statement clearly states to do your homework.

Done with this portion of the discussion.

:rolleyes: :(

Whatever. Please just stop with the personal stuff, telling me I seek preferential treatment because I'm a girl, telling me you don't like my 'why is he picking on me' bit, saying I look foolish, daring me to put you on ignore, etc., all just today.

Please stop talking about me, talk about the subject at hand.

I've asked you more than once in this thread.


Sandra
 
Last edited:
I wonder HOW many stations are gonna cutoff live TV for this...

Here is how ridiculous this has been, and I want to confirm this to be tru or not....according to 2 radio stations here(Dan LeBetard on 790 the ticket and Joe Rose on 560QAM)....this Tiger Woods issue have been MORE times on the cover of the New York Post than 9/11!:eek::confused::rolleyes:
 
:rolleyes: :(

Whatever. Please just stop with the personal stuff, telling me I seek preferential treatment because I'm a girl, telling me you don't like my 'why is he picking on me' bit, saying I look foolish, daring me to put you on ignore, etc., all just today.

Please stop talking about me, talk about the subject at hand.

I've asked you more than once in this thread.


Sandra

I have moved on...you should too....:rolleyes:
 
ENOUGH PEOPLE! Please, can we get back to the musing over Tiger and his follies. No more personal attacks on each other.

Seriously, there is too much curling to watch this week to try to herd cats in here. :)
 
I wonder HOW many stations are gonna cutoff live TV for this...

Here is how ridiculous this has been, and I want to confirm this to be tru or not....according to 2 radio stations here(Dan LeBetard on 790 the ticket and Joe Rose on 560QAM)....this Tiger Woods issue have been MORE times on the cover of the New York Post than 9/11!:eek::confused::rolleyes:
In this case Woods wants people to watch. Of course nothing will be said of any substance. He is probably at home now rehearsing his speech. It's so funny to see how many people say it was his personal business and yet look at how many sponsors have dropped him. I was right again. Golf is not like other sports .
 
In this case Woods wants people to watch. Of course nothing will be said of any substance. He is probably at home now rehearsing his speech. It's so funny to see how many people say it was his personal business and yet look at how many sponsors have dropped him. I was right again. Golf is not like other sports .

If it was exclusively his personal business, he wouldn't be be having a press conference at all. ;)


Sandra
 
There are three ways to tell when his argument is lost:

1). He clams up. I have never clammed up....the total amount of my post DISPUEST that statement completely. I never said this was one of the methods used in the thread.
2). He alters the original argument. I do not alter my statements. You guys just do not like nor agree with what I say....and need to some kind of justification to disagree. My argument in this thread has remained the same and has never changed.

Again when has a celebrity EVER caught in a scandal NOT done it this way?
You and I might by arguing different things. ALL made their 1st response to whatever scandal with a statement and no questions. AND that is my point. EVERYONE in here is moaning and pissing that Tiger is doing it this way....well guess what, that is how ALL celebrities do it initially until they sit on the Larry Kings and Oprahs of this world.
If this isn't a change in stance, I don't know what is. I guess you could call it a clarification!! :D

THey are gonna do it this way because they ALL have NOTHING to gain by going into a huge Q/A session once they initially respond. My best friend told me it's no different than a laywer stating it can go against his client accussed of a crime to take the stand.
That may be true immediately after the scandal comes to light. We're talking several months now, so that type of logic makes no sense now.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Former NJ Net Williams pleads guilty to shooting death of limousine driver..

RIP Mosi Tatupu

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 0, Members: 0, Guests: 0)

Who Read This Thread (Total Members: 2)