Was this a better Super Bowl than last year?
it was close. it was a great game for sure! congrats to Pitt
Was this a better Super Bowl than last year?
What a game.
This REALLY has to sting HD MM.
Not only does his least favorite team win the Super Bowl, but the biggest plays of the game were made by none other than a Kent State alum (James Harrison's 100-yard pick six) and a player from his beloved Buckeyes (Santonio Holmes).
It did sting. A lot! I'm trying to cool off before giving my thoughts on the game though.
For all the Steeler slobberers, this game should be enough proof on why of I took the Cards prior to the game.
No he didnt their is a replay shown by NBC that proved he didnt!
use him on 3rd down situations only. he'll be fine
i got a feeling that the cards offensive line will be the one to give
No he didnt their is a replay shown by NBC that proved he didnt!
Springsteen was horrible! At first, he was screaming about putting the chicken fingers down, turn up the volume, bs, bs, bs and I was like "just shut up and start singing" and then he launches into a few bad songs and ends with the best song of the set, Glory Days.
Where was Born in the USA? USA is home to the Super bowl of course...
I was more entertained looking for Max Weinberg and La Bamba in the band in the various camera shots until Glory Days started.
I was hoping the halftime dog of a concert could be saved by the girl in the red dress who was bopping up and down enough that I was hoping for an accidental wardrobe malfunction of her fakies coming out.
time to go back to the better singers/bands - the geezers aren't doing it (except Prince). I certainly wouldn't mind seeing Katy Perry at the halftime show but the NFL probably has to worry about inappropriate lyrics ("Kissed a Girl" song) or potential for intentional nudity.
You have absolutely no credibility after this statement.
And BTW, you maybe the only person I've talked to who thinks this way about Springsteen. To me, he put on an awesome show for the time he was allotted.
Cardinals got screwed. Santonio Holmes used the football as a prop in an endzone celebration after the catch, like a salt shaker and then threw it in the air. Right after the 10 annoying replays. 15 yards would have changed Warners last drive.
He was imitating LeBron.
One of multiple kicks in the groin to me throughout the game.
It did sting. A lot! I'm trying to cool off before giving my thoughts on the game though.
For all the Steeler slobberers, this game should be enough proof on why of I took the Cards prior to the game.
You have absolutely no credibility after this statement.
And BTW, you maybe the only person I've talked to who thinks this way about Springsteen. To me, he put on an awesome show for the time he was allotted.
I hate Springsteen, maybe they should have no one, don't have a concert, save time and start the second half earlier.
Maybe this will stifle some of the Big Ben critics.
It's all part of the experience man. You can't have a Super Bowl halftime without a musical act. That just isn't right.
And btw, I'm not a huge Bruce groupie by any means, but I did think The Boss put on an awesome show.
The problem with having a musical act is that they all have to be "Old timers". They can't afford to have another Janet Jackson/Justin Timberlake(SP?) fiasco.
So they have to use older musicians like Springsteen, Tom Petty,Prince or Paul McCartney. Who's next, Fleetwood Mac, Crosby Stills and Nash, Neil Young or the Eagles?
Springsteen said Cold Play should perform next year, are they too controversial for the half-time show? How about any R&B or Rap performer, are they too controversial for the half-time show? Some say AC/DC, maybe Metallica, Pearl Jam or The Red Hot Chili Peppers, are they too controversial for the half-time show?
Just let them play the damn game.
Geez, I come here to talk about the game, and what do I get? A whole page about musical acts. Fluff, fluff, and fluff again.