a 20 Mb connection for $49 is not that great.
In this town, its a steal
a 20 Mb connection for $49 is not that great.
I tried that as well, and still had issues, especially with MLB.tv
They look at your IP address as your true location. You can call and plead with them and they MIGHT remove the blackouts, but it's a pain. They obviously have never heard of the concept that some ISP's don't use local IP addresses (or they don't care).
I did a check online with Spectrum locally and 30 Down is $14.75 a month, 100 down for $66.00, 200 Down for $93 a month and 1 gig for $139 a month. I currently have 100 down. I considered dropping to 30 down, but I lose about 50% using wifi and with my son downloading games, streaming HD, I figured going to 30 would give me issues. If I had everything hard wired and had a 30 at all times, it would work out. Even with a good router I still lose about 50% in speed. I have read that is normal.
We sometimes have two different TV streams plus typical surfing going on our 30 Mbps Spectrum service at our cottage with no problem. We have a purchased Arris modem with an integrated 4-port router with WiFi. All of our streaming and surfing connections are WiFi, with only our environmental monitoring system and VOIP phone service ATA hardwired to router ports.
You may believe DSL is a dead tech but for those of us that choose to live in places where the nearest neighbor is measured in miles not feet DSL is alive and well. Tech upgrades have allowed 20/30 mb connections here in rural Colorado. Yeah I know not much compared to those GB speeds that are available where cable and fiber are available but a godsend to those rancher types that use it to manage the herds. Maybe that 5G cellular I keep hearing about will help but somehow I doubt that the Eastern Plains of Colorado is a priority.If it works for you and it's your only choice who am I to argue. My point actually was if you have fiber or cable available, why would anyone even think about opting for DSL, especially when like I said, it is essentially a dead technology in the US.
You may believe DSL is a dead tech but for those of us that choose to live in places where the nearest neighbor is measured in miles not feet DSL is alive and well. Tech upgrades have allowed 20/30 mb connections here in rural Colorado. Yeah I know not much compared to those GB speeds that are available where cable and fiber are available but a godsend to those rancher types that use it to manage the herds. Maybe that 5G cellular I keep hearing about will help but somehow I doubt that the Eastern Plains of Colorado is a priority.
Maybe time we withhold your food supply until we get fiber to OUR curb. ;-)
Ah WiMax, the 5G of the last generation. It was the answer to the last mile, until it wasn't.My brother would figuratively kill for 20Mb Internet. His best option is 6Mb WiMax.
I lose about 50% using wifi
That MIGHT be normal if you're on the 2.4Ghz band, but I have never experienced a 50% loss over 5Ghz. Does your router have 5Ghz wireless or just 2.4? If only 2.4, upgrade your router and you're likely to have much less speed loss.
That is interesting. I do not know if I am using 2.4 over 5. Any idea how to tell? If I am using over 2.4, how do I move it up to 5? I also wonder if my Roku, computer, etc would have any effect at 5?
It is a newer Netgear. I checked my laptop speed it is getting from the Netgear and it says the wifi speed is 72. I wonder why outboard checks from like Spectrum gives me only 45-50?
channel overcrowding really isn't an issue here
any real distance the the signal significantly drops off
You're lucky. Our local telco installs the same modems in every home and apartment in town. Those modems are only capable of 2.4Ghz, so many people are jamming the 2.4 band around me. I disable the wifi on their gateway and run my own behind it using 5Ghz.