If it's in the Hopper family, it's certainly going to have the new interface.except without the slow interface
If it's in the Hopper family, it's certainly going to have the new interface.except without the slow interface
Well, now you have heard of one more: me. I have a ViP722k.The TV2 out is more of a business thing now. I've only seen hd duos in restaurants lately. The last I heard of someone having one in their house is a couple years ago when my grandparents had dish.
They could design the "Hopper Lite" with a HD TV2 output, with HDMI cables being more reliable at longer distances now than they were when the old HD duo receivers were originally designed.I doubt very much it will have a TV2 out, SD or HD. Heck, even Dish must recognize SD is dead, even if there is still a market for it today.
Those damned CRTs can't last forever! Although a 27" and 36" of mine keep chugging along. Rarely used, of course.
How you easily run HDMI cabling through walls to different rooms ?with HDMI cables being more reliable...
How you easily run HDMI cabling through walls to different rooms ?
A hole in the floor in one room, run the cable through the basement, then up through a hole in the floor in the other room.How you easily run HDMI cabling through walls to different rooms ?
My solution doesn't require a "crap load of money." Just a large enough drill bit.As I said, "easily" and you added "crap load of money". I can't see it happening !
Neither did 16 tuners, until Dish did it.Putting a second HDMI output on a satellite receiver just doesn't sound feasible for any company right now.
Neither did 16 tuners, until Dish did it.
I would agree, if the wireless Joey had no fee. Remember, the purpose of the "Hopper Lite" is to get subscribers with the ViP DuoDVRs, who are used to not paying extra for the TV2 output, to upgrade. As long as the monthly fees stay the same, or actually go down, it should be a success. If the monthly cost would go up with the upgrade, then there will always be resistance.Adding a bunch of extra tuners makes more sense than adding extra HDMI outputs. No reason for them to do so when they have wireless Joeys now.
I would agree, if the wireless Joey had no fee. Remember, the purpose of the "Hopper Lite" is to get subscribers with the ViP DuoDVRs, who are used to not paying extra for the TV2 output, to upgrade. As long as the monthly fees stay the same, or actually go down, it should be a success. If the monthly cost would go up with the upgrade, then there will always be resistance.
Well, why would anyone expect to be able to watch HD for no extra cost? It was not that long ago that there was a fee for that (and some packages did not even have national HD channels available at all, except free previews and add-ons) and some providers still charge an extra fee for HD.Yes, but why would anyone expect to be able to watch different TV shows on multiple TVs in HD for no extra cost?
Is there such a device that converts coax to HDMI adapter?Maybe someday they can come up with a unit that is used as a central hub that can have multiple HD feeds to TVs without having to put a device at each TV. I have to imagine that this concept has already been thought up already and proven not to be feasible though. There would need to be a way to send an HD feed throughout the house as easy and coax does right now.
Is there such a device that converts coax to HDMI adapter?
Is there such a device that converts coax to HDMI adapter?