Interesting. At 40% I don't see them having a controlling stake at the onset, if this comes to fruition. Unless the remaining 60 gets split. So, no immediate changes. What would SiriusXM do with a competing platform, other than make it subscription only?
It seems almost likely that Liberty drove SiriusXM's participation in this deal.What would SiriusXM do with a competing platform, other than make it subscription only?
Could be license fees..but that's just a guessThat is one thing. Is there some kind of a loophole for SiriusXM, if they broadcasted songs on an FM outlet? I don't think so, but I'm trying to think of any possible angle.
Clear Channel Outdoor would be an entire division that would be removed from Clear Channel's holdings. You typically can't own stock in individual divisions.So basically Clear Channel was an initial investor in XM and owned a small stake, now it all comes full circle and SiriusXM might own a portion of Clear Channel?
I don't think that FM stations pay royalties on their Internet broadcasts so that's probably not a reasonable explanation.That is one thing. Is there some kind of a loophole for SiriusXM, if they broadcasted songs on an FM outlet? I don't think so, but I'm trying to think of any possible angle.
They had to merge to survive..XM was tied too closely to GM..GM was in total collapse mode taking XM with it..both survivedThey already acquired part of Pandora. I hate it when companies merge, even if only partially. That makes it that much closer to a monopoly. Sirius and XM should never have merged either.
They had to merge to survive..XM was tied too closely to GM..GM was in total collapse mode taking XM with it..both survived
True..but Sirius had non compatible technology and would not have been able to take over XM accounts..merger was the only way satellite radio could have survived..XM was installed in the vast majority of cars with satellite radioNot to get political but I still don’t think the merger should have been allowed by the government. The government instead got involved and passed the merger when they simply should have let them fail. If there was a market for it, it would come back.
This is almost impossibly difficult to do as they have to go back to the drawing boards in terms of music licensing (something they may not have been doing faithfully as I recall) as a new organization. There's also the issue that GM was primarily interested in XM as the carrier for OnStar that they replaced some years ago with wireless phone service. In a bankruptcy, most of the parts are wholesaled or broken up as necessary and that might mean that the satellite constellation gets separated from the streaming company.Not to get political but I still don’t think the merger should have been allowed by the government. The government instead got involved and passed the merger when they simply should have let them fail. If there was a market for it, it would come back.
I think if Sirius were that concerned about interoperability, they would have released some of the hybrid radios that the gubmint had required them to build.True..but Sirius had non compatible technology and would not have been able to take over XM accounts.
Didnt they dump the Sirius satellites?I think if Sirius were that concerned about interoperability, they would have released some of the hybrid radios that the gubmint had required them to build.