He said it was the same as EA now and I remember last time I looked at that app it would not do MPEG4 streams.
Well, I never said it was
exactly the same as EA, just that the
resolution was now the same. The change is on WA, and there's still no MPEG-4 SD on there as far as I've observed.
With my current subscriptions, receiving equipment, and tuning equipment, I can check resolutions for many of the MPEG-2 channels on DIRECTV (SD+HD), many of the Dish WA channels on 110W and 119W (MPEG-2 and H.264), some H.264 HD on 61.5W, FTA channels on 72.7W and other satellites (including some, but not many H.264 SD channels), and anything else I can make use of from any Ku/DBS-band satellite that drops a signal on my property. Also, anything someone else might be so kind as to send me a sample recording of that I can't otherwise receive can be a useful and viable resource, especially when barriers such as oceans or other territorial boundaries are involved.
While obtaining subscription services in a direct, digital form on a PC almost definitely involves some form of "hacking" by the many and varied definitions of the word, it does not and should not imply that anything illegal or even morally objectionable is taking place. Using a Roku or 16:9 Time box can be considered "hacking" because the IRD operates outside of its original, intended capabilities. The same can easily be said of means of utilizing a subscription on a PC by tuning on the PC instead of through the IRD while still using a subscribed conditional access card from one of your IRDs. In my opinion these are reasonable extensions of fair use, especially since devices such as the Hauppauge HD PVR can record all of the same programming to a PC, retain very high quality levels, and don't require that an IRD's lid ever be removed. Of course, since the HD PVR doesn't make a direct digital copy, information such as the transmitted video resolution is not available from it. Also, using the HD PVR for recording may be less practical in an HTPC or similar system due to the potentially high overhead of transcoding the input video to a bitrate that doesn't noticeably hurt the input quality.
Hopefully that clears a few things up.
Thanks to BuddyBoy for posting that nice screenshot.