As I look around the cities I pass through, I see a BUD on maybe one out of 200 homes. I would not be surprised if only one or two on average actually work. This has always been the true FTA loophole. Because our numbers are so tiny, it's hard for the providers to justify expensive encryption.
Except, that is, for bars. I would say that maybe 10 percent of the bars have big dishes - around here anyway. Of course the customers watching there vary in number from a handful to hundreds. Probably this is the major cause for provider concern over their signals. I doubt it's individual FTA-ers. It's the folks who profit off of the free signals (without sending any cut of the profits to the providers).
Times are scarce in FTA right now. History - gone. NatGeo- gone, CWs - gone. BIO- gone. Etc. I am thinking that, when the issue is discussed in board rooms, It's bars that cause the concern.
Except, that is, for bars. I would say that maybe 10 percent of the bars have big dishes - around here anyway. Of course the customers watching there vary in number from a handful to hundreds. Probably this is the major cause for provider concern over their signals. I doubt it's individual FTA-ers. It's the folks who profit off of the free signals (without sending any cut of the profits to the providers).
Times are scarce in FTA right now. History - gone. NatGeo- gone, CWs - gone. BIO- gone. Etc. I am thinking that, when the issue is discussed in board rooms, It's bars that cause the concern.