Iceberg said:IT CAME TODAY
(too bad I'm at work)
Iceberg said:Since it was new, I was able to have it repaired. They replaced the main board
Diamond Jim said:For $70 you can't beat it and I guarantee that you will like it better than the 3688. I also noticed that they are not listed in the Skyvison catalog and DMSI does not list software updates for them anymore. Maybe they did close up shop.
pro96 said:Thanks for the prompt reply Jim. As far as PQ.. how does it rate from 1-10 using svideo?
Diamond Jim said:I don't know, I use it with RCA cords and on 1 to 10, I would give it a 9. Good sharp and clear picture.
drhydro said:Just to add on to Jims comments, I have a satworks 3186, and the picture quality is excellant. You might have to play with color balance on your tv tho, i noticed color balance changed in between the 3168 and other input sources. Using coax the pic was the best i have seen on my tv with a coax connection.
Diamond Jim said:You know, after thinking about it, I can't imagine having a receiver that doesn't blind scan. That would make life a lot rougher.
Iceberg said:huh, tell me about it
I've had some really good receivers that don't do blind scan and it sucks. I dont know what I wouldnt do without a blind scan receiver