Scott Greczkowski said:Rick's company is him and his wife.
Skyvision is a little larger then that.
Rick the rip u off master company.. nice lol
Sent using SatelliteGuys with my EVO non 3D LoL
Oh press "like" if u liked my reply lol
Scott Greczkowski said:Rick's company is him and his wife.
Skyvision is a little larger then that.
There IS an Editor for the Manhattan stb. I sent it up into the Downloads queue over a week ago. I've used it to edit the Manhattan sat file, and it works. Eventually , I'm sure it will show up, otherwise you can PM me and I'll email it to you. Early days yet, with the Manhattan RS-1933, clearly .
I thought about it... but then thought I might never get it.Have 'em ship it to Iceberg.
He can do another review, then send it on.
2nd day air, on the house, is more like it....forgot to ship it... and if I still want it shipped 2nd day air or regular ground...
eh if they do they doI wish Jeff would send him one to review. Nobody gives a fair honest equipment review like the Iceberg.
eh if they do they do
If they don't oh well...
Sorry for any inconvience.
Stone1150, Are you writing the code? If you are not, don't apologize for an inconvenience caused by firmware not provided by you....
I am sure that firmware will be released in due time to correct operational issues. Usually the first factory release firmware on new STBs have rough edges....
Stone1150, Are you writing the code? If you are not, don't apologize for an inconvenience caused by firmware not provided by you....
I am sure that firmware will be released in due time to correct operational issues. Usually the first factory release firmware on new STBs have rough edges....
How well does the manhattan play high datarate video signals - stutter-free? and is the firmware actually being updated - I hear about this July update, but I don't see it posted on their website so is it only firmware updates posted out of sight only for insiders at this point and not their customers?
I have nothing to do with the code. That said i am at the site that support the Manhattan. Files were there and then removed. Some did get those files and some were advised to get them before they were pulled. That is why I offered an apoligy. You are correct that I don't need to. That said, Don't I owe the people I told to get the files something in the way of an explanation of why they are not there?. Shouldn't I apoligise for telling them to get something that isn't there anymore? Or should I just let them chase their tail? Questions and assumptions like the one a couple posts above start up. However, If people are going to assume that I have anything to do with code simply because I apoligise for people not seeing files that were posted at one time, I will just keep my mouth shut and let people assume what they want I guess. Have a great day!
So I'm confused. My Manhattan has May software, should I be loading the July release or are we waiting for something else since July was pulled?