Smith said:You know, if your CPU handle decoding 2 HD streams from satellite, MPEG-2 decomp and encoding/writing 2 HD TS streams to disk, you'll start thinking as E* engineers and will try to reduce CPU load for support journaling file system.
No encoding is done in the receivers and decoding is much simpler and less resource intensive than encoding (don't the receivers use hardware decoders). There were some benchmarks made with a few filesystems here, to save you all the reading they said:
The conclusion is obvious by the "Total Time For All Benchmarks Test." The best journaling file system to choose based upon these results would be: JFS, ReiserFS or XFS depending on your needs and what types of files you are dealing with. I was quite surprised how slow ext3 was overall, as many distributions use this file system as their default file system. Overall, one should choose the best file system based upon the properties of the files they are dealing with for the best performance possible!
There is some info on journaling file systems here.