What kind of Integrity and Character do you have when you intentionally SPIKE players while running the bases ?
Your making MY point .... Thank you.True, but it was considered acceptable back then. Do you think Bob Gibson should be in the HOF? He intentionally threw at batter's heads.
It doesn't look too good for Pete now....
http://espn.go.com/espn/otl/story/_...ines-shows-pete-rose-bet-baseball-player-1986
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I agree with you 1000%." For 26 years, the notebook has remained under court-ordered seal and is currently stored in the National Archives' New York office, where officials have declined requests to release it publicly"
Someone doesnt like Rose!!
Anywho, I couldn't care less if the man bet on his mother giving birth to a two-headed Donkey...He paid the price....literally and figuratively.
Many many many pro athletes have done much worse than this and got away with far less of a punishment..if any.
Unless he intentionally played poorly and bet against his own team...its all water under the bridge.
No, Lance pulled a Rose.I grew up a Reds fan in the 70s and that was my team when I was in Miami when there was no team. So I am as much as a Pete Rose fan as any. But I am sorry, he has lied over and over and over again. He swore on the two-headed donkey that he NEVER, EVER bet as a player/manager and there it is, as plain as the huge schnoz he has for a nose...he bet on baseball. I am so disappointed in him because he was getting really close. He probably assumed that since that notebook would never be opened, he would lie one last time and pray and hope he can take it to the grave. Now that this info is out, no ONLY am sure he bet for his Reds team as a player, but I would not doubt he placed bets AGAINST some of those bad Reds/Phillies/Expos he played on as well.
Sad day. He pulled a Lance Armstrong.
First, he didn't bet on baseball. Then he only bet on baseball after he became a manager. Now it appears he bet while he was still playing. What's next ? Who's to say he didn't bet on them to lose a game.The man bet money on sporting events...including on his own team to win.... how is this "compromising the integrity of the game"?
He placed bets through a friend, who went through a bookie, etc, etc. He did it that way to hide winnings for tax reasons, right ? Not because betting in Vegas would be "too public" or visible....What if he placed all his bets in Vegas... would that have been OK?
So what. That's like committing a crime but no one knows you did it - does that make you not guilty ?Besides no one is asking how a sealed document got leaked....doing so is an actual crime.
He isn't though.Just people he's Pete Rose and the all-time hit king he shouldnt be held at a higher standard then the rest of us.
He isn't though.
If I break the rules at work, I will be punished.
He broke written workplace rules, and was punished per workplace rules.
He then continued to lie about it to circumvent workplace punishments.
What would happen if any of us did the same things at our jobs?
All MLB players are subject to the same gambling rules. He is not being singled out. If he was allowed into the Hall, then he would be getting special treatment that others subjected to the same penalty did not get.
What's the point of rules if you don't enforce them or their proscribed penalties.
Rose did it to himself, and then made it worse by continuing to lie about it til this day.
And the man keeps making it worse by continuing to lie about what he did and did not do.IMO the man paid the price for his transgressions. Let him have his one day in the sun as he's not getting any younger
I used to say that this is exactly what they'll do, just to spite him but to also acknowledge his accomplishments on the field. Now I don't think they will.Personally I say to wait til after he dies.