jimdandyvi said:Another source on the slide lists the cost of ESPN at $4.40 and the top ten RSNs cost on average $2.51.
Jim
That's the value of men that watch events live and don't skip commercials.
jimdandyvi said:Another source on the slide lists the cost of ESPN at $4.40 and the top ten RSNs cost on average $2.51.
Jim
Thankyou that was my point exactly. I see no reason to buy Google tv if they block access to three of the major networks. No more beta tester- early adopter for me from now on.Yeah except that ABC, CBS, and NBC, along with HULU are blocking their content from GoogleTV. Glad I didn't waste that $179-$300 yet.
Major networks blocked web tv shows from google tv - eBrandz Search Marketing & Technology News
Interesting chart that shows just how much money is at stake in the Fox/Cablevision and Fox/Dish disputes. It is amazing that subscribers pay $4.08 per month for 1 channel (ESPN) that is watched on average 1 minute per day. By 2017, Wells Fargo Securities estimates that retrans consent for all broadcast networks will hit $4.6 billion...wow.
http://www.mediaweek.com/mw/photos/stylus/155629-RtransLO.pdf
What I find amazing is the number of people who could get much better HD reception along with all the sub-channels by simply investing in a quality rooftop antena. I live in suburban Chicago and years ago got an excellent rooftop as a back up to the cable/sat services I had. Just as to never having to miss out on an important game due to tech or weather difficulties. This before HD. Now with my rooftop. I get better HD than any of the sat/cable services along with the multitude of sub-channels. While I have the locals with cable, when I settle down to watch a game on a network station, it is with the OTA unless I plan on doing a lot of surfing. Anyone in the area I live in could have the same excellent OTA like I do but almost no one does. They all get the locals via sta/cable. I wonder how many people might get wise if prices skyrocketted dues to the locals? A good OTA with install, a few hundred bucks. Of course this doen't apply to those who just can't get OTA but for those who can it is well worth the investment.
I think the reason is people want an all-in-one solution. They don't want multiple avenues for one service. This is also the reason bundled packages with some cable providers has become so popular. One bill, one provider, one relationship.
I know the last thing I want to do is deal with getting a rooftop antenna installed because the company I'm currently paying for my locals is having issues. If anything, THEY should pay for it.
I bought a hi-gain rooftop antenna several years ago (we're about 22-23 miles from the tower) and installed it myself in the attic of my garage. It works great. But I agree, the all-in-one solution is probably more popular. E* receivers have the integrated capability, not sure about D*. I'm hoping my cable company's DVR will accommodate my OTA antenna as well.
I think the reason is people want an all-in-one solution. They don't want multiple avenues for one service. This is also the reason bundled packages with some cable providers has become so popular. One bill, one provider, one relationship.
Fat chance. The cablecos want you captive with them. They'd rather that you not even know that TV stations still broadcast (for free) via antenna !I'm hoping my cable company's DVR will accommodate my OTA antenna as well.
They (cablecos, satellite, etc) have to make their systems relatively idiot-proof too. A lot of people have enough trouble using set-tops, changing inputs (Dish has a "recovery" button on their remotes !!), and so on. Also, some people will feel that the cableco or satellite company should sell and install the TV antenna.I think the reason is people want an all-in-one solution.
I beg to disagree with you. If pleasing Yankees fans was hot on Dish's list, they'd be carrying YES Network.If Dish drops FOX 11/1 and the Yankees had made the World Series, could you imagine the howls of protest. Might have helped speed up the resolution. I'd like to hear / see some progress as we're getting closer and closer.
If Dish drops FOX 11/1 and the Yankees had made the World Series, could you imagine the howls of protest. Might have helped speed up the resolution. I'd like to hear / see some progress as we're getting closer and closer.
Think what will happen around Nov. 15th when we still have no FOX. The fence sitters will give up and jump ship. I don't hold "E" at fault but FOX holds the long term hammer.And just think what'll happen on 11/1 when Dish does drop Fox, especially here in Texas where the Rangers did make the series.....defections en masse to DirecTV.
I bought a hi-gain rooftop antenna several years ago (we're about 22-23 miles from the tower) and installed it myself in the attic of my garage. It works great. But I agree, the all-in-one solution is probably more popular. E* receivers have the integrated capability, not sure about D*. I'm hoping my cable company's DVR will accommodate my OTA antenna as well.
I beg to disagree with you. If pleasing Yankees fans was hot on Dish's list, they'd be carrying YES Network.
What I find amazing is the number of people who could get much better HD reception along with all the sub-channels by simply investing in a quality rooftop antena. I live in suburban Chicago and years ago got an excellent rooftop as a back up to the cable/sat services I had. Just as to never having to miss out on an important game due to tech or weather difficulties. This before HD. Now with my rooftop. I get better HD than any of the sat/cable services along with the multitude of sub-channels. While I have the locals with cable, when I settle down to watch a game on a network station, it is with the OTA unless I plan on doing a lot of surfing. Anyone in the area I live in could have the same excellent OTA like I do but almost no one does. They all get the locals via sta/cable. I wonder how many people might get wise if prices skyrocketted dues to the locals? A good OTA with install, a few hundred bucks. Of course this doen't apply to those who just can't get OTA but for those who can it is well worth the investment.