It's still PRIVILEGE information scarecrow.
Scarecrow? Or do you not know what a straw man is so that's your rebuttal, some name calling? lol.
I never said any of this information wasn't privileged, just questioned what the legal case was when roy added his usual flair / embellishments before tapping out and declining to back up what he said. You took up his cause for some reason.
For all we know someone on Freeman's side leaked it to continue to ratchet up the tension with the goal of getting his release. If you hadn't noticed, it worked. Why would you leak that while trying to find a trade partner? Point being show me how the leaker can be proved, or explain how that particular leak involves HIPAA. That's my question, it has gone unanswered.
Sent from my SCH-I605 using Tapatalk 2
Last edited: