I got something similar from Charter here. We now have 100 down and 10 up. But in reality we get about 11.5 up for some reason. The charges are the same.
I was thinking the opposite, that if you paid the $40 fee for EHD activation, then you would not be subject to the monthly "non-DVR" fee, since your receiver would no longer be a non-DVR. This seems like a cash grab by Dish to give everyone an incentive to pay for DVR access, even if they have no intention of using it (and even if they do not even have an EHD) since it would be cheaper than paying the monthly fee. Then, if the customer later decides that they want DVR service, they could just go ahead and add a hard drive, without having to call to activate it.Maybe they will allow EHDs for free with this new charge...
Here is another thought: if you already have a receiver with a monthly DVR fee, and you downgrade to a non-DVR receiver to try to save money, would you then be considered a "new" non-DVR subscriber? If so, this would be Dish's way of discouraging people from downgrading equipment.From what I understand the 'fee' is for the account like the DVR 'fee', one fee per account. And as of now it's for new customers only.
I agree. Just how many channels do they need to be on, and how many times do they need to say Good Night to each other every night? I swear, if I have to hear "Good Night, John Boy" one more time, I am going to drop a nuke on Waltons Mountain. Oh wait, you were not talking about the TV series....There is such thing as too much greed. The Waltons are an example of this.
Goodnight JimBob!I agree. Just how many channels do they need to be on, and how many times do they need to say Good Night to each other every night? I swear, if I have to hear "Good Night, John Boy" one more time, I am going to drop a nuke on Waltons Mountain. Oh wait, you were not talking about the TV series.