sometimes they get resolved quickly.This sucks. I live in Lexington and the local NBC and Dish have a dispute. Looks like we wouldn't see the Vikings/Seahawks game this Sunday.
people are dropping pay tv because its too spendy...not because a local is missingDo they not realize that people are starting to cut the cord on tv because of this?
The preface to that comment wasn't really about it being dropped, but about how the channels are asking for too much money making the service too expensive.people are dropping pay tv because its too spendy...not because a local is missing
I'm meaning how the station owners are asking for more and more money every year. It has to stop at some point.people are dropping pay tv because its too spendy...not because a local is missing
Only when you cut the cord entirely.I'm meaning how the station owners are asking for more and more money every year. It has to stop at some point.
I dont think locals are the reason your bill goes up. I mean think about it.I'm meaning how the station owners are asking for more and more money every year.
With that many channels going up, and averaging the price across the board for all customers, local channels asking for 300% increase starts adding up. Now it is not just locals, but do play a very real role in it. ESPN is just as guilty, which is owned by Disney, which also played the same game with ABC. CBS just did the same thing, and Fox just got a $0.50 increase for their Fox News alone. My question is, channels that say they didn't even ask for a price increase got dropped(MAVTV) and I am sure there is a reason, but why?I dont think locals are the reason your bill goes up. I mean think about it.
If you subscribe to a package that has say ESPN (yeah I know where some people will whine about sports...thats not the point) and ESPN gets more money, your bill goes up.
But when a company like Raycom or Scripps gets more money for re-transmission, how can Dish charge more for those when you may not have one of those companies for locals? They can't technically but they probably just roll it into the price change so some folks say thats the reason.
Last year I know Dish had disputes with Sinclair and Tegna (Gannett). Minneapolis, MN has both but Duluth, MN (where I use to live) doesn't. So using that theory you cant say my bill went up because of locals.
very minimal compared to subscription channelsWith that many channels going up, and averaging the price across the board for all customers, local channels asking for 300% increase starts adding up. Now it is not just locals, but do play a very real role in it.
viewership? I honestly dont know.My question is, channels that say they didn't even ask for a price increase got dropped(MAVTV) and I am sure there is a reason, but why?
This sucks. I live in Lexington and the local NBC and Dish have a dispute. Looks like we wouldn't see the Vikings/Seahawks game this Sunday.
Does anyone from DIRT have an update?
432 stations since I chose half the stations to renew, which was believable last year, but we can really choose whichever percentage of locals you desire.. Times $0.10=$43.2x14M=$604,800,000/ month x 12 months= $7,257,600,000/yearWhat kind of math is that?
2 stations go up $.10
14 million x .20 = 2.8 million a month or 33.6 million a year.
Am I missing something?