That's just the "fluff" they tell their affiliates, to look like it was their choice. Want to bet it's all money driven, and whoever provides the services for 87w tried to jack their yearly "rent" to a point they didn't or couldn't pay?
So, their next best affordable choice must have been 113w. After all, they first started from 125w, so it's almost moving home...
Yep. I was trying to be diplomatic, but my first thought when reading the letter they sent to their affiliates was "This is cheaper for us."