It would be nice if Dish could "replace" the offending provider like LIN with a neighboring market provider... or with the NY or LA Feed until the dispute was settled or for good, that might prompt company's like LIN to re-think... 

We are already paying an additional $16 a mo for the local channels via DISH..... so to find out at this stage in the game that we may lose the ONE local channel that we actually watch is really upsetting! On the upside, I do have a huge arial antenna on my roof..I may have to get it hooked up and running![]()
Dear Don,
Thank you for your email and I just want to say that I understand your disappointment and that we are trying hard to come to an agreement with DISH network so you do not lose any of your programming. Basically Don, we are asking DISH for fair market value, DISH is already charging you the subscriber for our station and we are just asking DISH to compensate us fair market value. The rates we are asking for are a fraction of what DISH pays for many cable networks that you may never even watch. Local television stations are consistently ranked among the most-watched channels, in part because we provide local news and programming that cable networks don't offer and we host/sponsor important community service events, yet we do not get compensated fairly for the value of our stations. Nobody would find that reasonable, which is why Congress enacted laws that allow us to negotiate for fair compensation.
I hope this email has helped in answering your question. For more information; please go to www.linmedia.com
Thank you for your support of your LOCAL Stations
Huge Kudos to the responses here. No one wants to lose their locals, but unlike a couple of years ago when so many always blamed Dish, it has become apparent the networks try to hold Dish, and us, hostage unless their demands are met. And now it isn't just Dish who now stands up to them.
I admit, I don't know who the costs rests with, but I'm guessing most of it is with Dish. Maybe it's time to extend the free OTA reception. Don't let the networks get anything at all except if there is a specific cost to get the signal to Dish that they don't otherwise incur to get it OTA. And then regulate Dish (Direct, etc..) that they can only recover their cost to get the signal to us. Nothing more for networks. Please note, this is not "I think I should get it for free." Well it is, but only because it is free OTA, so the networks should not be allowed to charge for their programming just because it comes over the Dish. And being fair, Dish/direct should not be able to charge us either, other than recovering their costs.
They (dish) pays for other providers, why not broadcasters.. Heck Dish does not provide local programming at cost to us. I know the amounts dish pays per subscriber but can't tell.
Bet your wrong. It's D* that usually caves.Dish will cave. They have before. From the pioneer to do this, Nexstar Broadcasting to every other market, dish has come up with payments per local subscriber. Nexstar went on sucessfully to get payments from Cable that other groups since have. They (dish) pays for other providers, why not broadcasters.. Heck Dish does not provide local programming at cost to us. I know the amounts dish pays per subscriber but can't tell.
From the website of WIVB/WLNO Buffalo, NY...........
Question: What do you mean by fair compensation?
Answer: The fair compensation we are asking for amounts to pennies a day per subscriber, which is actually much less than what cable and satellite companies pay for cable networks that you may or may not watch. Our stations are important assets to our local community. They are consistently ranked among the most-watched television channels, in part because we provide local news, programming and information that cable networks don’t offer. Local broadcasters around the country are fighting for fair compensation and an even playing field with cable networks so that we can continue to provide you premiere news, sports, entertainment, weather, traffic updates, political coverage and other local and national programming that is most important to you.
[/email]
Dear Valued DISH Network Customer,
As you may already be aware, DISH Network and LIN are in contract negotiations regarding your local stations. LIN has demanded an outrageous rate increase of over 140% for the continued carriage of your channels.
The increase is so immense that DISH Network and its customers couldn't possibly absorb it. It is like demanding an overnight increase of almost $8 a gallon for gas, which is unacceptable and irresponsible.
In these challenging economic times, it is important that we rally together to show LIN how their actions negatively affect DISH Network and its customers. We apologize that LIN is putting you in the middle of our negotiations. We understand your outrage and want you to know that you're not alone! Public policy makers have voiced their opposition to broadcasters taking away local TV news, sports, weather, and important emergency information in order to force TV distributors like DISH Network to meet their increasing demands.
We feel a strong obligation to protect our customers from outrageous rate increases, like those that LIN has demanded—but we need your help! LIN needs to hear how their absurd demands and negotiation tactics negatively impact viewers like you. We urge you to make your voice heard.
With your help, we can send a clear message that outrageous rate increases are unfair, irresponsible, and frustrating to you, their viewers, and hard-working Americans. Most importantly, with your help, we can convince LIN to negotiate in good faith.
We will continue to attempt negotiations with LIN and are hopeful we will be able to reach a fair deal.
OK. Imagine the charge you pay for locals going up from $5/mo to $7. Feel better?