I think that's a big difference. Have you tried running your OTA line straight to your TV and see what kind of signals you get?Tuner sensitivity is a big player. Neighbor runs straight into a Sony flat screen. The DISH OTA adapter is much less sensitive it seems and probably why the thing runs so hot - electricity is being converted into heat.
No, actually it was Echosphere.Wasn't EchoStar in the 1980's Charlie selling BUDs out of the back of his pickup?
Didn't get into DBS until 1995.
EchoStar had C-Band those days, which is still satellite service.Directv was not around then either, however their parent company, AT&T was. It does not matter that the parent company was around then, they had completely different services at that time.
EchoStar had C-Band those days, which is still satellite service.
But its parent company, EchoStar, was.
Exactly and that's who I bought from, first small dish receiver that I know of. No need to get into a pissin' contest with some of the "pros" here.
EchoStar was originally formed in 1980 by its chairman Charles Ergen as a distributor of C band TV systems. In 1987, it applied for a direct broadcast satellite (DBS) license with the Federal Communications Commission and was granted access to orbital slot 119° west longitude in 1992.
EchoStar - Wikipedia
There's no pissing about it. It's either right or wrong. In your first post you said you were with DISH since the 80's. That's simply not possible. This is what's right:
Dish Network officially began operations on March 4, 1996, as a service of EchoStar. EchoStar, a precursor to Dish Network, was formed in 1980 by its chairman and chief executive officer, Charlie Ergen along with colleagues Candy Ergen and Jim Defranco, as a distributor of C-band satellite television systems.
All of your points (direct and indirect) were answered above. The devil in this site is the details.What does it matter? You're in the noise level nit picking some moot point that isn't even relevant to my topic. Since you have lots of time on your hands how about checking out my posts for typos Mr. "Lifetime Supporter". I'm sure you'll find some if you look hard enough.
Type
Public
Traded as
Industry Satellite television[1]
Founded 1981; 38 years ago (Original EchoStar)
March 4, 1996; 23 years ago (Dish Network)
Founders Jim DeFranco
Charlie Ergen
Cantey Ergen
I think that's a big difference. Have you tried running your OTA line straight to your TV and see what kind of signals you get?
What does it matter? You're in the noise level nit picking some moot point that isn't even relevant to my topic. Since you have lots of time on your hands how about checking out my posts for typos Mr. "Lifetime Supporter". I'm sure you'll find some if you look hard enough.
Type
Public
Traded as
Industry Satellite television[1]
Founded 1981; 38 years ago (Original EchoStar)
March 4, 1996; 23 years ago (Dish Network)
Founders Jim DeFranco
Charlie Ergen
Cantey Ergen
What does it matter? You're in the noise level nit picking some moot point that isn't even relevant to my topic. Since you have lots of time on your hands how about checking out my posts for typos Mr. "Lifetime Supporter". I'm sure you'll find some if you look hard enough.
Type
Public
Traded as
Industry Satellite television[1]
Founded 1981; 38 years ago (Original EchoStar)
March 4, 1996; 23 years ago (Dish Network)
Founders Jim DeFranco
Charlie Ergen
Cantey Ergen
First, I totally agree Dish OTA reception sucks when compared to receivers in TVs. But, if the signals have been near 100%, and you're not willing to test reception on another device (which I understand), how do you make the conclusion that the tuner is not as sensitive?Murphy's Law - most signals have been at or near 100% for days. My conclusion - the DISH dual tuner is not as sensitive as other tuners.
First, I totally agree Dish OTA reception sucks when compared to receivers in TVs. But, if the signals have been near 100%, and you're not willing to test reception on another device (which I understand), how do you make the conclusion that the tuner is not as sensitive?
Glad you get to determine when a thread is done. I'm trying to figure out your logic.OK, I'll bite - please see post #14 & 15, page 1.
end of thread.......
OK, I'll bite - please see post #14 & 15, page 1.
end of thread.......