The stats page on Stanford's site is showng you as ranked #1 and #11 right now. Is that a glitch, or related to the recovered files you think?
Join the SatelliteGuys Folding@Home Team with your PS3!
- Thread starter Scott Greczkowski
- Start date
- Latest activity Latest activity:
- Replies 315
- Views 35K
The stats page on Stanford's site is showng you as ranked #1 and #11 right now. Is that a glitch, or related to the recovered files you think?
SatinKzo,
It's a Core2 duo E6400 with 2GB ram running 64 bit Fedora Core 6. I've turned off the unnecessary services, but I'm still running X, Gnome, with Firefox and GAIM.
It's a Core2 duo E6400 with 2GB ram running 64 bit Fedora Core 6. I've turned off the unnecessary services, but I'm still running X, Gnome, with Firefox and GAIM.
It's running 4 instances of FahCore_a1.exe, using between 25%-60% of each "processor". I am thinking I might try tweaking the defaults to see if I can squeaze a little more out.
When I first signed up for Folding I saw that "Foxbat" had already been used as a donor name, so I signed up using "Foxbat@SatelliteGuys" to uniquely identify myself. I changed back to "Foxbat" after I had been folding for a week due to a problem with the monitoring software I was using on the Mac. So there are two "Foxbat" donors according to Stanford (they hide the "@" and everything after it) which is why I'm in 1st and in 11th place.
I have to figure out how best to shut down folding on my Mac. I had Apple Updates waiting to be installed, so I went to shut down folding. Unfortunately, the procedure to stop folding caused my Terminal session to exit unexpectedly. There went 76% completion. Then when I tried to restart the non-console folding, it reset my Username to anonymous and the team # to 0! By the time I got that fixed, well, it was another 64% completion wiped out. 
Sounds like that beta is really buggy. No wonder you get so many extra points for it, they probably assume you lose 30% of your work!
-John
-John
Foxbat
How did you fix the user name and the team # thing? My console keeps doing this too (going to anonymous username and team # to 0) and I have not been able to fix it.
Thanks
Well, this stinks. I finally finished my first WU and I see this in the log...
.
.
.
[20:31:47] + Attempting to send results
[20:32:08] - Couldn't send HTTP request to server
[20:32:08] + Could not connect to Work Server (results)
[20:32:08] (171.64.65.58:8080)
[20:32:08] - Error: Could not transmit unit 01 (completed April 20) to work server.
[20:32:08] + Attempting to send results
[20:32:25] - Server does not have record of this unit. Will try again later.
[20:32:25] Could not transmit unit 01 to Collection server; keeping in queue.
[20:32:25] + Closed connections
.
.
.
This is repeated a few times and doesn't seem to be working. Anyone know if there something I need to do to fix this, or is this possibly a problem at the server that will eventually work itself out?
.
.
.
[20:31:47] + Attempting to send results
[20:32:08] - Couldn't send HTTP request to server
[20:32:08] + Could not connect to Work Server (results)
[20:32:08] (171.64.65.58:8080)
[20:32:08] - Error: Could not transmit unit 01 (completed April 20) to work server.
[20:32:08] + Attempting to send results
[20:32:25] - Server does not have record of this unit. Will try again later.
[20:32:25] Could not transmit unit 01 to Collection server; keeping in queue.
[20:32:25] + Closed connections
.
.
.
This is repeated a few times and doesn't seem to be working. Anyone know if there something I need to do to fix this, or is this possibly a problem at the server that will eventually work itself out?
that server is down according to this post on the folding forum will be up tomorrow so it will sort itself out eventuallly.
http://forum.folding-community.org/ftopic19400.html
http://forum.folding-community.org/ftopic19400.html
Ok, I shut down X on my machine, so it's command line only. It's shaving about 90 seconds off each 5000 step increment(1%)
I am building one of these next week! I can't wait!:
Great.......now I'm going to have to build a second one. :tux:
Oh well, I guess competition is good, just could get a little expensive if I have to build a personal cluster
Great.......now I'm going to have to build a second one. :tux:
Oh well, I guess competition is good, just could get a little expensive if I have to build a personal cluster
Yea it could but i really need to upgrade any way.
:up
