Yes, I believe St. Jobs is the sole reason for the craziness around iP-s...You think the religion will end when Jobs reign ends?
And I don't think there is anybody capable of replacing him in this capacity (from Apple execs).
Diogen.
Yes, I believe St. Jobs is the sole reason for the craziness around iP-s...You think the religion will end when Jobs reign ends?
You think the religion will end when Jobs reign ends? I am not convinced of that.
And I don't think there is anybody capable of replacing him in this capacity (from Apple execs).
Those of you slamming Jobs: How do you feel, now that he's "stepped down" by taking a leave of absence? Serious medical issues. Think he's coming back? How long do you think before we know?
And why is it that some feel the need to vilify others that use the iPhone, by using words like "worship," "magic," "cult" and "religion?" Certainly there are some, but NOT ALL, that are overly enamored of the Apple brand. Same can be said for almost any brand. And yes, Apple did use "evangelists" in the early days to establish themselves. It was a smart marketing tool, for a day when most buyers were geeks to at least some degree. Today, they're selling to a much wider audience, most of whom don't care about, and maybe never heard of, Steve Jobs. Accept it: It serves the needs of many, with a major brand most trust. If you say "Android is the better choice" and make other comments disparaging others' non-Android choices, who is the cultist?
People have different needs and make different choices. And should be respected.
Those of you slamming Jobs: How do you feel, now that he's "stepped down" by taking a leave of absence? Serious medical issues. Think he's coming back? How long do you think before we know?
And why is it that some feel the need to vilify others that use the iPhone, by using words like "worship," "magic," "cult" and "religion?" Certainly there are some, but NOT ALL, that are overly enamored of the Apple brand. Same can be said for almost any brand. And yes, Apple did use "evangelists" in the early days to establish themselves. It was a smart marketing tool, for a day when most buyers were geeks to at least some degree. Today, they're selling to a much wider audience, most of whom don't care about, and maybe never heard of, Steve Jobs. Accept it: It serves the needs of many, with a major brand most trust. If you say "Android is the better choice" and make other comments disparaging others' non-Android choices, who is the cultist?
People have different needs and make different choices. And should be respected.