I only have two stations in my DMA that'll have to move: WBSF (46) and WAQP (48).
That should make it easy.
That should make it easy.
You're assuming that you're in a TV vacuum and that may cause you heartburn. Michigan appears to have several markets that aren't all that geographically or topographically separated.I only have two stations in my DMA that'll have to move: WBSF (46) and WAQP (48).
Now we study the FCC's 10 phase plan for channel loss based on the Phase Assignment Tool an Phase Scheduling Tool software programs.Well I guess now we find out what we keep, what we lose, what we crunch together....
thanks....I will read up on itNow we study the FCC's 10 phase plan for channel loss based on the Phase Assignment Tool an Phase Scheduling Tool software programs.
https://apps.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-16-1095A1.pdf
I think this pdf may have been referenced previously in this thread. It is also important to note that the pdf represents a call for comments as opposed to a finished plan.
The goals are laudable, but the physics perhaps remains to be answered.
Your period key doesn't seem to be workingWell good day everyone I red some where the big Broadcasting stashions 37/to50 if they didn't sell their channels that they will stay where they are and that they say their is not enough tower men crew to handle the big work load so good luck with that one I think of what I have Read the FCC has fell behind and don't even no it yet I think we will see a lot of court happening soon I think it is going to get pretty messey and a long time to sort this big mess out
What is a "substation"? Do you mean "translator" or "subchannel" perhaps?the one local above 36 on the eastern shore has 3 substations, wonder how they will be affected
What other nearby markets are competing for frequencies (perhaps Philly or DC)? Radio frequencies, like DMA designations don't typically obey political boundaries.It looks like Maryland TV stations are in for a major upheaval, especially the two major network channels.
kinda bothWhat is a "substation"? Do you mean "translator" or "subchannel" perhaps?
Both Philly and DC overlap the Baltimore market.What other nearby markets are competing for frequencies (perhaps Philly or DC)? Radio frequencies, like DMA designations don't typically obey political boundaries.
Your in the same boat as the New Orleans areaIn the Baltimore market, there are 5 stations assigned frequencies above 36.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_television_stations_in_Maryland
Channel 2(ABC) - 38
Channel 22(PBS) - 42
Channel 24(MNT) - 41
Channel 45(Fox) - 46
Channel 54(CW) - 40
There are also two stations in Western MD and one on the Eastern Shore of MD that are above 36.
It looks like Maryland TV stations are in for a major upheaval, especially the two major network channels.
That being the case, most of those stations will have to share the same 35 channel pool. Even if you can't currently receive them, they can still interfere if they're using the same frequency.Both Philly and DC overlap the Baltimore market.
I submit (again) that it is very important that we be very precise with our terminology. Squishy or misapplied terms can cause confusion and lead to misunderstanding something that will likely be pretty important going forward.kinda both
kinda both
sub channel 47-1, 47-2, 47-3
was confusing it with 16 that also has fox 21, same news diff programs. diff stations
Yeah ....I submit (again) that it is very important that we be very precise with our terminology. Squishy or misapplied terms can cause confusion and lead to misunderstanding something that will likely be pretty important going forward.
Substation is a term that doesn't apply in radio broadcast. It is certainly valid in electricity where the product travels over wires but in the radio world it is called a translator because the relayed frequency must be different from the original frequency.
It is probably bad form to declare some channels subordinate as they all come through as one stream even though there could be a 47.1 and a 26.1 on the same frequency. The parent and child thing isn't really valid if there are multiple flagship channels; this situation already exists in markets where the two 720p "Big Four" feeds share a frequency.Also just like the "sub-channels" would accurately refer only to 47-2 and 47-3. Not the main or "primary" channel of 47-1.
It is probably bad form to declare some channels subordinate as they all come through as one stream even though there could be a 47.1 and a 26.1 on the same frequency. The parent and child thing isn't really valid if there are multiple flagship channels; this situation already exists in markets where the two 720p "Big Four" feeds share a frequency.